Re: ctags(1) and mg(1) again

2011-11-27 Thread Sunil Nimmagadda
Manpage changes as suggested by jmc@, thanks. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/sunil/cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -p -r1.24 Makefile --- Makefile2 Feb 2011 05:21:36 - 1.24 +++ Makefil

btree(3) byte order checks don't make sense

2011-11-27 Thread andres . p
even though oracle still checks b.order at runtime, the rest of obsd db 1.85 functions, namely those pertaining to hash(3), use BYTE_ORDER so, 1. it's inconsistent to do runtime on btree but not on hash 2. complicating the code by checking endianness after assigning defaults -- even though all o

Re: ix: no need to rearm interrupts, we only need to reenable queues

2011-11-27 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:43:38PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: >> shaves off some bus read/write operations. >> tested on 82598 and 82599. ok? > > On what information is this based? The intel driver in .Fx does not do > that and I wonder if

Re: ix: no need to rearm interrupts, we only need to reenable queues

2011-11-27 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:43:38PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > shaves off some bus read/write operations. > tested on 82598 and 82599. ok? On what information is this based? The intel driver in .Fx does not do that and I wonder if it is enough in all cases to just reenable the queues. > diff