libpcap 1.2.0 functions

2011-11-02 Thread Lawrence Teo
This diff ports a few core functions from libpcap 1.2.0 to libpcap in base. My main goal is to get the latest versions of Snort (2.9.x) to build and run, which requires these functions from libpcap>=1.0. (Technically, it is not Snort that needs libpcap>=1.0, but rather a new "data aquisition" libr

print ASNs in traceroute, another try..

2011-11-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
my last attempt to do this fetched info from bgpd, which is great for some things, but not so many people could use it. this version uses cymru.com's dns based lookups instead (nicer than the various other traceroute implementations which do this using whois lookups, as of course this gets cached

Re: rc.d/xdm, check for broken xkb

2011-11-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/11/02 14:00, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:31:19AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:39:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > If you hit the xkb file/directory problem (for example, if you follow > > > the "upgrading without install

Re: rc.d/xdm, check for broken xkb

2011-11-02 Thread Brad
On 02/11/11 9:00 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:31:19AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:39:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: If you hit the xkb file/directory problem (for example, if you follow the "upgrading without install kernel" instru

Re: rc.d/xdm, check for broken xkb

2011-11-02 Thread Brad
On 02/11/11 8:59 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:42:15AM -0400, Brad wrote: On 02/11/11 8:31 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:39:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: If you hit the xkb file/directory problem (for example, if you follow the "u

Re: rc.d/xdm, check for broken xkb

2011-11-02 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 02:00:47PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:31:19AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:39:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > If you hit the xkb file/directory problem (for example, if you follow > > > the "upgra

Re: rc.d/xdm, check for broken xkb

2011-11-02 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:31:19AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:39:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > If you hit the xkb file/directory problem (for example, if you follow > > the "upgrading without install kernel" instructions), you can't type at > > the key

Re: rc.d/xdm, check for broken xkb

2011-11-02 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:42:15AM -0400, Brad wrote: > On 02/11/11 8:31 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:39:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >>If you hit the xkb file/directory problem (for example, if you follow > >>the "upgrading without install kernel" instruct

Re: rc.d/xdm, check for broken xkb

2011-11-02 Thread Brad
On 02/11/11 8:31 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:39:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: If you hit the xkb file/directory problem (for example, if you follow the "upgrading without install kernel" instructions), you can't type at the keyboard, even to switch to a text

Re: rc.d/xdm, check for broken xkb

2011-11-02 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:39:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > If you hit the xkb file/directory problem (for example, if you follow > the "upgrading without install kernel" instructions), you can't type at > the keyboard, even to switch to a text console. > > What does anyone think about di