Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Marc Espie wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:05:18AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > And from the look of it they also have -J, but .xz is so rarely used > > right now I'm not sure it is something we really need to copy... > > That's not gonna be the case from gnome3 (fo

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:05:18AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > And from the look of it they also have -J, but .xz is so rarely used > right now I'm not sure it is something we really need to copy... That's not gonna be the case from gnome3 (for instance). As I've been told by Antoine, they'r

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Right that was sort of how I was thinking, although I'm not sure it'd be easy to do. And from the look of it they also have -J, but .xz is so rarely used right now I'm not sure it is something we really need to copy... On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 04:59:36PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > On Tue

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > I agree. > > Or if we must have compression flags just have one flag and let tar > figure out the right tool to use. Having -Z -z -J -j etc etc is silly. GNU tar no longer needs those flags... their "tar xf foo" works just fine whether fo

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Nicholas Marriott
I agree. Or if we must have compression flags just have one flag and let tar figure out the right tool to use. Having -Z -z -J -j etc etc is silly. On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:41:39PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:43:53PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > > this di

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:43:53PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > this diff adds a -J flag to tar that calls xz for compress/decompress. > > > Requires you to install the xz package on your system. > > > > No way. > > > > Base never depends on external things. > > Well pval added support f

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > this diff adds a -J flag to tar that calls xz for compress/decompress. > > Requires you to install the xz package on your system. > > No way. > > Base never depends on external things. Well pval added support for bzip2 years ago in a similar way...

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread David Coppa
On 10/4/11, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> this diff adds a -J flag to tar that calls xz for compress/decompress. >> Requires you to install the xz package on your system. > > No way. > > Base never depends on external things. But since our tar already has bzip2 support using 'j' and bzip2 is a port, I'

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Amit Kulkarni
>> this diff adds a -J flag to tar that calls xz for compress/decompress. >> Requires you to install the xz package on your system. > > No way. > > Base never depends on external things. http://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git;a=tree Probably can't import xz into base as parts of xz are GPL v3.

Re: tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Theo de Raadt
> this diff adds a -J flag to tar that calls xz for compress/decompress. > Requires you to install the xz package on your system. No way. Base never depends on external things.

tar -J for xz

2011-10-04 Thread Remi Pointel
Hi, this diff adds a -J flag to tar that calls xz for compress/decompress. Requires you to install the xz package on your system. Attached is the diff, critical positive or negative would be appreciated ;-). Thanks, Remi. Index: cpio.1 ==

La Géolocalisation de Vos Véhicules avec COYOTE

2011-10-04 Thread GeoCoyote
Document sans nom Si vous ne pouvez pas lire ce message, consultez notre version en ligne Francois / 735 QWZ 69 DERNIHRE POSITION : 05/03/2008 - 16:43 94190 Villeneuve St-Georges 88 km/h POUR L'ENTREPRISE Riduction des heures supplimentaires Riduction

Re: file(1): prevent printing unknown magic filename

2011-10-04 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
Now thinking again I see no much point in my diff, I prefer yours as it's easier to update to a newer file(1), no point in changing only this. ok from me. On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:33:13AM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:56:11PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > > H