touch(1): subsecond and POSIX 2008 support

2011-08-17 Thread Philip Guenther
This diff adds to touch(1) support for the -d option specified by POSIX 2008 that permits specifying subsecond timestamps, as well as nanosecond support in the -r option, and a general simplification over the main loop. oks? Philip Index: usr.bin/touch/touch.1 =

vmware is stupid wrt to the giaddrs in dhcp packets when pxe booting

2011-08-17 Thread David Gwynne
vmwares pxe rom in guests uses the giaddr (the address of the dhcp relay) as the default ip gateway. this is a problem if you're running carped firewalls, because you'll be running a dhcrelay on each of them attached to the "hardware" interface, not the carped interface. if the vmware client reque

nanosecond timestamps for cp, mv, compress, opencvs, mail, and install

2011-08-17 Thread Philip Guenther
The diff below adds support to various utilities to preserve timestamps to the nanosecond. Most of them already preserve down to microseconds and this just makes them preserve the nanoseconds part too. That might seem pointless but failure to do that can confuse programs when, for example, "c

Re: LAC & LNS server with OpenBSD

2011-08-17 Thread Gruel Bruno
Hello, First thank's for your help et very good jobs for npppd, it's realy a good tool. But it seem not to do what i want. (http://fai.woody.hopto.org/Docs/bsdrp-example-pppoe-l2tp.png). I will try rp-l2tp How can i have a full doc off npppd ?? But i confirm that npppd work fine on my lab. Tha

xterm bug

2011-08-17 Thread Marco Peereboom
After the long debate yesterday about clipboards sucking major eggs and stuff I started looking into the problem. One of the problems is that xterm doesn't honor the "Keep Selection" flag. The code is a little tangly but if I read it correctly it looks like a simple test was missed. This brings

Re: allow ospfd -v to set verbose logging in ospfe/rde

2011-08-17 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:07:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/08/17 17:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Currently when ospfd is started with "ospfd -v", the verbose logging flag > > is only set for the parent process, so the detailed messages from rde/ospfe > > are not logged. > > > >

Re: allow ospfd -v to set verbose logging in ospfe/rde

2011-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/08/17 17:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Currently when ospfd is started with "ospfd -v", the verbose logging flag > is only set for the parent process, so the detailed messages from rde/ospfe > are not logged. > > The diff below passes it to the other processes so that if you store all > os

Re: allow ospfd -v to set verbose logging in ospfe/rde

2011-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/08/17 17:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I guess ripd, ldpd, ospf6d, bgpd, ldapd and dvmrpd will have a similar > problem, oh, and a few others, I was just looking for IMSG_CTL_LOG_VERBOSE...

allow ospfd -v to set verbose logging in ospfe/rde

2011-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
Currently when ospfd is started with "ospfd -v", the verbose logging flag is only set for the parent process, so the detailed messages from rde/ospfe are not logged. The diff below passes it to the other processes so that if you store all ospfd logs you'll get the same information logged with -v a

Re: sysctl__string fails to return old length

2011-08-17 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:43:54PM +1000, Joel Sing wrote: > According to the sysctl(3) man page, calling sysctl with a NULL value for > oldp should result in the current size being returned. Hm, it also says when ENOMEM is returned, that we'll fill in as much data as possible, which doesn't seem

sysctl__string fails to return old length

2011-08-17 Thread Joel Sing
According to the sysctl(3) man page, calling sysctl with a NULL value for oldp should result in the current size being returned. This works correctly for sysctl_rdstring(), but not for sysctl__string(). ok? Index: kern_sysctl.c === R

Re: LAC & LNS server with OpenBSD

2011-08-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/08/17 12:18, Gruel Bruno wrote: > Hello, > > > I just want to know if it plan to have a real implitation of L2TP on OpenBSD. > > Is there a work in progress ? or never ? See /usr/src/usr.sbin/npppd; it is not built/distributed by default yet, but the code is there.

Re: LAC & LNS server with OpenBSD

2011-08-17 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
"Gruel Bruno" writes: > Hello, Hi. > I just want to know if it plan to have a real implitation of L2TP on OpenBSD. > > Is there a work in progress ? or never ? Without knowing what you already know about OpenBSD and L2TP, it's a bit difficult to answer. Consider taking a look at /usr/src/usr.s

LAC & LNS server with OpenBSD

2011-08-17 Thread Gruel Bruno
Hello, I just want to know if it plan to have a real implitation of L2TP on OpenBSD. Is there a work in progress ? or never ? Thank's Bruno Gruel This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by Amavisd-new, and is believed to be clean.

Aries Technology Inc. Social Media Release

2011-08-17 Thread aries . technology
aries.technol...@gmx.co.uk has sent you a Aries Technology Inc. Social Media Press Release. We're Giving Away 90 days FREE on Courses! Increase Enrollment By Offering Certification Programs Need the IC3, Living online and Key apps GET A a 90 day trial!! Request a Free Demo call Click here ht