Sistema de envmo de Emails
Programamos este sistema para que puedas entrar al servidor de correo que
quieras
Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail y Todos los corporativos
Configurado con 84 servidores SMTP
No utiliza el tuyo y esta libre de bloqueos de IP
Lo que parecma imposible ya no lo es
Hace Marketing
Hello,
FYI:
1) The OPTION MODIFIERS section of dhclient.conf(5) indicates that the
default client configuration script processes only options 1 (subnet
mask), 3 (routers), 6 (domain name servers), and 15 (domain-name). In
fact /sbin/dhclient-script also uses option 28 (broadcast address).
2) dh
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 17:39 +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading through lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c and I found this right at the
> end of the file:
>
> ---
> /* See if there's any data left. If so, read in flags. */
> if (data.size > (p - (char *)data.data)) {
>
Hi,
I'm reading through lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c and I found this right at the
end of the file:
---
/* See if there's any data left. If so, read in flags. */
if (data.size > (p - (char *)data.data)) {
bcopy(p, (char *)flagsp, sizeof(int));
p += size
On 2011/08/10 08:01, Bogdan wrote:
>
> The information from ifconfig -A and maybe also netstat -rn are
> pretty important in showing what is wrong. I have an idea what you
> missed, but
> I'm not going to guess based on incomplete information.
>
> This would require to
> commute back to trunk set
- Original Message -
From: Stuart Henderson
To: Bogdan
Cc: "tech@openbsd.org"
Sent:
Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: interface trunk0
On
2011/08/10 06:25, Bogdan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to create a trunk0
interface with the following setup:
> OpenBSD 4.0, i386
>
>
On 2011/08/10 06:25, Bogdan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to create a trunk0 interface with the following setup:
> OpenBSD 4.0, i386
>
>
> PF disabled;
>
>
> $ sudo cat /etc/hostname.em0
> up
>
> $ sudo
> cat /etc/hostname.em1
> up
>
>
> $ sudo cat /etc/hostname.trunk0
> trunkproto failover
This machine is critical for local infrastructure and cannot suffer any
downtime.
Until my boss gives me another machine to move all that stuff on, I cannot do
much, and I am requested to enable
link aggregation functionality on this server
- Original Message -
From: Paul Irofti
To:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 07:06:09AM -0700, Bogdan wrote:
> No is not a typo or anything, is just:
>
> $ uname -a
> OpenBSD server 4.0 GENERIC.MP#936 i386
Where do you see yourself in 5 years?!
No is not a typo or anything, is just:
$ uname -a
OpenBSD server 4.0 GENERIC.MP#936 i386
- Original Message -
From: Paul Irofti
To: David Coppa
Cc: Bogdan ; "tech@openbsd.org"
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: interface trunk0
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:41:46PM +
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:41:46PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Bogdan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to create a trunk0 interface with the following setup:
> > OpenBSD 4.0, i386
> ^^^
>
> REALLY?
I think that was just a typo. 9 and 0 are so clo
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Bogdan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to create a trunk0 interface with the following setup:
> OpenBSD 4.0, i386
^^^
REALLY?
Hello,
I tried to create a trunk0 interface with the following setup:
OpenBSD 4.0, i386
PF disabled;
$ sudo cat /etc/hostname.em0
up
$ sudo
cat /etc/hostname.em1
up
$ sudo cat /etc/hostname.trunk0
trunkproto failover
trunkport em0 trunkport em1 10.10.13.25 netmask 255.255.255.0
$ sudo sh
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 21:49 +0900, Ryan McBride wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:07:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > this is indeed the way it was supposed to work.
>
> I dissagree. This is not at all what my understanding was of how it was
> supposed to work. You'd have to talk to dhart
On 2011 Aug 10 (Wed) at 22:08:25 +0900 (+0900), Ryan McBride wrote:
:On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:53:02PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
:> * Ryan McBride [2011-08-10 14:49]:
:> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:07:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
:> > > this is indeed the way it was supposed to work.
:>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:53:02PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Ryan McBride [2011-08-10 14:49]:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:07:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > this is indeed the way it was supposed to work.
> >
> > I dissagree. This is not at all what my understanding was of how i
* Ryan McBride [2011-08-10 14:49]:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:07:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > this is indeed the way it was supposed to work.
>
> I dissagree. This is not at all what my understanding was of how it was
> supposed to work. You'd have to talk to dhartmei about his origina
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:07:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> this is indeed the way it was supposed to work.
I dissagree. This is not at all what my understanding was of how it was
supposed to work. You'd have to talk to dhartmei about his original
intent, but as far as I recall the current b
this is indeed the way it was supposed to work.
* David Gwynne [2011-08-10 05:44]:
> this reflects my understanding of how this was supposed to work. i have
> written rules with the expectation that they work this way.
>
> On 10/08/2011, at 4:56 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd l
19 matches
Mail list logo
