NUEVO COMPILADO DE TESTS 2011
COMPLETAMENTE ACTUALIZADO-CON RESULTADOS E INTERPRETACIONES
Test psicologicos,infantiles ,para orientacion vocacional,psicotecnicos,
para entrevistas laborales, seleccion de personal, escalas , protocolos
,cuestionarios , aptitud, inteligencia, etc
CONTENIDO
TESTS
* Christopher Zimmermann [2011-07-28 02:05]:
> ntpd does have a fixed port number (2049)
err, no :)
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
On 07/28/11 01:33, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On 07/27/11 23:42, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
RPC does not work that way. It uses the portmapper at port 111 for
discovery. NFS at 2049 is also a known port. The rest are supposed
to be unknown.
Unfortunately it isn't supposed to work that way.
>> > Do you have a particular usage that needs this?
>>
>> No, I just run a local nfs server; at the moment only serving one
>> single, trusted client.
>> So I'm not in desperate need for fixed ports, but I think fixed ports
>> are a lot cleaner and over all easier to maintain.
>
> RPC does not wor
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:45:56PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Can PowerPC do unaligned accesses or not?
>
> I'm bringing this up *again*, because the fragmentary dialog on ICB
> about how powerpc is supposed to behave doesn't agree with observable
> reality.
>
> | some models can affor
> On 07/27/11 23:42, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > Do you have a particular usage that needs this?
>
> No, I just run a local nfs server; at the moment only serving one
> single, trusted client.
> So I'm not in desperate need for fixed ports, but I think fixed ports
> are a lot cleaner and over all
On 07/27/11 23:42, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
Do you have a particular usage that needs this?
No, I just run a local nfs server; at the moment only serving one
single, trusted client.
So I'm not in desperate need for fixed ports, but I think fixed ports
are a lot cleaner and over all easier to ma
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:49:01PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> Didn't know about this...
>
> http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_plural_of_firmware
>
> ok for me
Me too.
Ken
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > ok?
> >
> > Index: distrib/miniroot/install
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
wrote:
> Any ideas?
>
> # cd /usr/src && make SUDO=sudo build
> ...
> cc -O2 -pipe -Wall -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith
-Wcast-qual -Wsign-compare
Do you have a particular usage that needs this?
Some minor nits on this diff
- I would use UINT16_MAX or SHORT_MAX instead of (1<<16)-1.
- Spaces around "=" in "port=0" please.
- Rest of main() uses exit(1) not return (1) and err/errx not fprintf
(aside from for usage) should stay consistent.
> now here also for rpc.statd and rpc.lockd. But I could only test
> mountd, because I have no clients for lockd. I would really like to see
> this committed in cvs.
Sorry, but I strongly disagree with what you are doing here.
I suspect you want to select the ports by hand so that you can do por
Hi,
now here also for rpc.statd and rpc.lockd. But I could only test
mountd, because I have no clients for lockd. I would really like to see
this committed in cvs.
Cheers,
Christopher
Index: sbin/mountd/mountd.8
===
RCS file: /c
Didn't know about this...
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_plural_of_firmware
ok for me
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> ok?
>
> Index: distrib/miniroot/install.sub
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/distrib
ok?
Index: distrib/miniroot/install.sub
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/distrib/miniroot/install.sub,v
retrieving revision 1.647
diff -u -p -r1.647 install.sub
--- distrib/miniroot/install.sub14 Jul 2011 14:54:57 - 1.647
+++ d
A small pile of Fujitsu Siemens Scenic machines landed in my lap, all of
them apparently with onboard Broadcom gigabit ethernet that are
recognized as
bge0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5751" rev 0x01, BCM5750 A1 (0x4001):
apic 2 int 16, address 00:30:05:84:9a:5d
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: B
On 2011 Jul 27 (Wed) at 19:22:34 +0200 (+0200), Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:22AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > +#define SETNAME(name) do { names = (name); limit = nitems(name); } while
> > > (0)
> >
> > use
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:22AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > +#define SETNAME(name) do { names = (name); limit = nitems(name); } while
> > (0)
>
> userland is not supposed to use nitems I think? But it keeps sneaking
> in because the kernel hea
On 27 July 2011 12:45, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Can PowerPC do unaligned accesses or not?
>
I'm far from an expert but I know at least some power pc can do
unalign access, like those MPC8xxx, so the socppc port can do
unaligned accesses.
> I'm bringing this up *again*, because the fragment
> Can PowerPC do unaligned accesses or not?
We support two kinds of architectures:
unaligned
strict alignment
In reality, we could write kernel emulators and make every
architecture be unaligned. In the worst cases of access, it would be
extremely expensive. Making a powerpc act truly un
Can PowerPC do unaligned accesses or not?
I'm bringing this up *again*, because the fragmentary dialog on ICB
about how powerpc is supposed to behave doesn't agree with observable
reality.
| some models can afford unaligned access with a msr setting,
| but we frown upon this and won't enable thi
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58:22AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > +#define SETNAME(name) do { names = (name); limit = nitems(name); } while
> > (0)
>
> userland is not supposed to use nitems I think? But it keeps sneaking
> in because the kernel he
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> +#define SETNAME(name) do { names = (name); limit = nitems(name); } while (0)
userland is not supposed to use nitems I think? But it keeps sneaking
in because the kernel headers don't protect it.
Hi,
This diff (original version from nicm@) adds resolving of systcl
numbers to names. e.g.:
914 sysctl CALL __sysctl(hw.pagesize,0x8443e4,0x7f7bb8b8,0,0)
914 sysctl RET __sysctl 0
utrace(2) wil not make release due to ABI/API lock. But this can make
if I get reviews and ok's,
Hi,
Here's a diff that allows telling mountd the udp and tcp port to use.
Christopher
Index: mountd.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/mountd/mountd.8,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 mountd.8
--- mountd.831 May 2007 19
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:33:14 +0200, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:20:38PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 01:57:10PM -0500, Josh Hoppes wrote:
>> > Thanks for the help and for the better understanding of routing
>> > domains and tables. In the end I was o
Madonna 23
Albums
1- Discografía
1983-2005 / 2- American life / 3- Bedtime
stories
/ 4- Confessions on a dancefloor / 5-
Erotica
26 matches
Mail list logo
