On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:33:51PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Funny enough, when pkill was first added I added an option to confirm
> > each kill. Guess what letter it used? That's right, -i, modeled
> > after rm.
>
> "Confirm each k
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Funny enough, when pkill was first added I added an option to confirm
> each kill. Guess what letter it used? That's right, -i, modeled
> after rm.
"Confirm each kill"? Ah, that's the option to follow up each kill
with a SIGKILL between the
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Benny Lofgren wrote:
>> Hmmm. Two of (arguably) the four best known BSD distributions have it.
>> The idea of -i meaning case insensitivity is there already in other (1)
>> commands, so I'd say it makes sense to add.
>>
>> From a practical standpoint, I'm all for
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:01:20PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> One knob for the dwarfen guys that work in the IT mines, to bind the machines
> and rule them all.
And under the Linux kernel undefined constants, bind them !
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:55:25PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> some time ago, mk@ and matthew@ discovered a regression in security(8):
> Our rewrite killed changelist(5) wildcard support.
Yes it did.
> I think we should put it back, the changelist(5) manual explicitly
> documents the feature.
Wrong thread :(
On 11 June 2011 19:24, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> The cleaner sometimes accidentaly pushes the power button of one of my
> machines.
>
> So +1.
The cleaner sometimes accidentaly pushes the power button of one of my machines.
So +1.
On 2011-06-11 23.07, STeve Andre' wrote:
>> NetBSD has that since March 2005 (committed by sketch@).
>> FreeBSD copied it from NetBSD a few days later.
>> procps.cvs.sourceforge.net (used e.g. in Debian) does not have -i.
>> OpenSolaris does not have -i.
>>
>> So I'd say we shouldn't add it.
>>
>>
On 06/11/11 16:44, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Perkin wrote on Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:02:05PM +0100:
Add -i to ignore case when matching process name
It seems nobody picked this up, so i had a look at it.
NetBSD has that since March 2005 (committed by sketch@).
FreeBSD copied it from
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 09:06:05PM +0200, gilbert.fernan...@orange.fr wrote:
> One knob to be able to turn it on so when you're working
> on a machine, and console dies, to be able to shutdown
> properly and avoid a fsck.
One knob for the dwarfen guys that work in the IT mines, to bind the machine
* On 2011-06-11 at 21:44 BST, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Jonathan Perkin wrote on Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:02:05PM +0100:
>
> > Add -i to ignore case when matching process name
>
> It seems nobody picked this up, so i had a look at it.
>
> NetBSD has that since March 2005 (committed by sketch@).
Ri
Hi,
Jonathan Perkin wrote on Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:02:05PM +0100:
> Add -i to ignore case when matching process name
It seems nobody picked this up, so i had a look at it.
NetBSD has that since March 2005 (committed by sketch@).
FreeBSD copied it from NetBSD a few days later.
procps.cvs.sourc
With this commit..
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:src
Changes by: j...@cvs.openbsd.org2011/04/14 15:06:38
Modified files:
sys/dev/ic : re.c rtl81x9reg.h
Log message:
Add several additional adapter types and correct definition of
RTL8103E, from FreeBSD.
support was ad
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 03:00:10PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> That leaves "avoid shutdown by accidentally brushing against the
> button", but that isn't an issue in practice.
A lot of people are using PCs as servers instead of real servers
(with two power supplies and all the bell and w
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:58:17AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Like I asked on icb, why do we need a knob for this at all?
One knob to turn it off so when you have installed servers
in a room, to avoid seeing one shutdown because you pressed
the power button when moving one. To give you an exa
Peter Hessler wrote:
> :> Like I asked on icb, why do we need a knob for this at all?
>
> I have used this feature on a regular basis. Very useful when you want
> to politely power off a system, but you don't have/don't want a login.
You misunderstand. The question is, why do we need a knob t
Hi,
some time ago, mk@ and matthew@ discovered a regression in security(8):
Our rewrite killed changelist(5) wildcard support.
I think we should put it back, the changelist(5) manual explicitly
documents the feature.
Comments?
OKs?
Yours,
Ingo
Index: security
===
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> I have used this feature on a regular basis. Very useful when you want
>> to politely power off a system, but you don't have/don't want a login.
>
> +1
>
> especially when i am trying off and on to make my xorg.conf work in
> dual monitor
> I have used this feature on a regular basis. Very useful when you want
> to politely power off a system, but you don't have/don't want a login.
+1
especially when i am trying off and on to make my xorg.conf work in
dual monitor setup for months, and it hangs. And pressing the power
button for
On 2011 Jun 11 (Sat) at 15:00:10 + (+), Christian Weisgerber wrote:
:Mark Kettenis wrote:
:
:> Like I asked on icb, why do we need a knob for this at all?
:
:I don't need one. I'd be just as happy to simply rip out
:machdep.kbdreset where it's currently abused for that purpose.
:
:* If yo
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Like I asked on icb, why do we need a knob for this at all?
I don't need one. I'd be just as happy to simply rip out
machdep.kbdreset where it's currently abused for that purpose.
* If you press one of these soft power buttons a little bit longer,
they typically shut o
Like I asked on icb, why do we need a knob for this at all?
22 matches
Mail list logo
