Re: Quick sanity test for sili(4)/ahci(4) diff

2011-05-06 Thread Jason Crawford
On 05/06/11 13:52, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > If you have a sili(4) or ahci(4), I'd appreciate a quick test of the > diff below. As long as you can still mount your disks without > panicking, then it worked. :) > > One test for each is sufficient, so please reply to the list to save > others from r

Re: Quick sanity test for sili(4)/ahci(4) diff

2011-05-06 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:52:19AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > If you have a sili(4) or ahci(4), I'd appreciate a quick test of the > diff below. As long as you can still mount your disks without > panicking, then it worked. :) > > One test for each is sufficient, so please reply to the list

Re: Quick sanity test for sili(4)/ahci(4) diff

2011-05-06 Thread Mattieu Baptiste
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > If you have a sili(4) or ahci(4), I'd appreciate a quick test of the > diff below. As long as you can still mount your disks without > panicking, then it worked. :) > > One test for each is sufficient, so please reply to the list to save >

Re: ld.so speedup for large binaries with many shared libraries

2011-05-06 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:46:35PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:34:56PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 05:15:34PM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse > > > wrote: > > > > > > > sparc

Re: ld.so speedup for large binaries with many shared libraries

2011-05-06 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:34:56PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 05:15:34PM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse > > wrote: > > > > > sparc64 and loongson here, no issues. > > > > Works for me as well, amd64 and i386.

Re: sudoers, add ENV to env_keep?

2011-05-06 Thread Bob Beck
> I'm all for killing the ksh autoswitch feature. Whenever I end up on a > system with EDITOR set to vi and ksh as shell I'm lost. If people like to > use a specific mode they should add it to .profile. > I'm not, I use ksh and like the fact that it makes my history keystrokes appropriate for my e

Re: ld.so speedup for large binaries with many shared libraries

2011-05-06 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 05:15:34PM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse > wrote: > > > sparc64 and loongson here, no issues. > > Works for me as well, amd64 and i386. > > ciao, > David asmatthieu@ found out hppa does not work. I can fonfirm tha

Aerosmith - Discografía y Pendrive de Regalo

2011-05-06 Thread Discos MP3 - Solo de Oferta
Aerosmith Rocks o Draw The Line Live! Bootleg Night in the Ruts Rock In A Hard Place Done With Mirrors Classics Live! Io

Re: huge relayd diff needs testing

2011-05-06 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:12:43PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote: > hi, > > the following diff needs some serious testing in existing setups. > it does not add any new features... > > ...but it reorganizes, shuffles, and changes the relayd code and > internal APIs and it introduces an privsep API tha

Quick sanity test for sili(4)/ahci(4) diff

2011-05-06 Thread Matthew Dempsky
If you have a sili(4) or ahci(4), I'd appreciate a quick test of the diff below. As long as you can still mount your disks without panicking, then it worked. :) One test for each is sufficient, so please reply to the list to save others from redundant effort. Index: ata/atascsi.c ===

Re: sudoers, add ENV to env_keep?

2011-05-06 Thread Todd C. Miller
On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:22:05 BST, Stuart Henderson wrote: > If you have something which handles ENV (i.e. an interactive shell), > isn't it already the case that you can run arbitrary commands? I suppose it is not as bad as BASH_ENV (which is used for non-interactive shells). I'm still not comfo

Re: ld.so speedup for large binaries with many shared libraries

2011-05-06 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > sparc64 and loongson here, no issues. Works for me as well, amd64 and i386. ciao, David

Re: adduser(8): send email improvements

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Lumsden
Further to the earlier diff, this accomodates bob's New User verbiage and logic from the install routine when someone answers "yes" to a question where that is not an option, e.g. -config_create -mark Index: adduser.8 === RCS file: /

possible regression with -current ospfd

2011-05-06 Thread Gregory Edigarov
Hi, I remember exactly it has been working in the pre 4.9 times. now it doesn't again, but may be I am missing something: test net scheme: router 1 (gif0) - (gif0) router 2 here's what hapenning: router 1: # ospfctl s i Interface AddressState HelloTimer Linkstate Uptime

Re: sudoers, add ENV to env_keep?

2011-05-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/05/06 08:49, Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 06 May 2011 11:37:53 BST, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > I'm not entirely convinced it's safe to add ENV to env_keep by > > default but the only other workaround I've found (i.e. ln -s > > /usr/bin/{vi,not_emacs} and setting VISUAL=/usr/bin/not_e

Re: sudoers, add ENV to env_keep?

2011-05-06 Thread Todd C. Miller
On Fri, 06 May 2011 11:37:53 BST, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I'm not entirely convinced it's safe to add ENV to env_keep by > default but the only other workaround I've found (i.e. ln -s > /usr/bin/{vi,not_emacs} and setting VISUAL=/usr/bin/not_emacs) > is messy and annoying to do on multiple machi

Re: sudoers, add ENV to env_keep?

2011-05-06 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:46:40PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:37:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > sudo doesn't preserve ENV by default, so any shell settings (e.g. > > set -o emacs) you might have in your ${ENV} file don't take effect. > > > > for people who li

Re: ld.so speedup for large binaries with many shared libraries

2011-05-06 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:15:28AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Just noticed I still have Ms for this. Has it been tested on enough > arch yet? So far I know it's been run on > > amd64 (sthen) > armish (sthen) > i386 (aja, sthen) > macppc (aja, sthen) > loongson (phessler) > > Any others? Con

Re: ld.so speedup for large binaries with many shared libraries

2011-05-06 Thread Henning Brauer
I'm actually running with this for a week or so as well, amd64 and i386, didn't notice breakage * Stuart Henderson [2011-05-06 11:17]: > Just noticed I still have Ms for this. Has it been tested on enough > arch yet? So far I know it's been run on > > amd64 (sthen) > armish (sthen) > i386 (aja,

no.swapctrlcaps

2011-05-06 Thread Eivind E
Add swapctrlcaps to Norwegian map. Tested on laptop with and without usb keyboard attached on boot, with no.swapctrlcaps in /etc/kbdtype. Don't need remapping for X11 in .xmodmaprc anymore. Index: sys/dev/pckbc/wskbdmap_mfii.c === RC

sudoers, add ENV to env_keep?

2011-05-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
sudo doesn't preserve ENV by default, so any shell settings (e.g. set -o emacs) you might have in your ${ENV} file don't take effect. for people who like EDITOR=vi but also like "set -o emacs" in the shell, this is really annoying; EDITOR/VISUAL are preserved, so the (imo horrible) /bin/ksh "featu

Re: sudoers, add ENV to env_keep?

2011-05-06 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 11:37:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > sudo doesn't preserve ENV by default, so any shell settings (e.g. > set -o emacs) you might have in your ${ENV} file don't take effect. > > for people who like EDITOR=vi but also like "set -o emacs" in the > shell, this is really

better loopback handling for ospfd and ospf6d

2011-05-06 Thread Claudio Jeker
This is based on a diff by Patrick Coleman. Quoting his correct analysis: > I believe ospfd/ospf6d are incorrectly handling states for loopback > interfaces - basically, if the interface is down when the daemon is > started, it comes up in state LOOP anyway. if_fsm then throws the > error "if_fsm:

Re: ld.so speedup for large binaries with many shared libraries

2011-05-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Just noticed I still have Ms for this. Has it been tested on enough > arch yet? So far I know it's been run on > > amd64 (sthen) > armish (sthen) > i386 (aja, sthen) > macppc (aja, sthen) > loongson (phessler) > > Any others? Considering how much it

Re: ld.so speedup for large binaries with many shared libraries

2011-05-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
Just noticed I still have Ms for this. Has it been tested on enough arch yet? So far I know it's been run on amd64 (sthen) armish (sthen) i386 (aja, sthen) macppc (aja, sthen) loongson (phessler) Any others? Considering how much it sucks if ld.so is broken, it would be good to have reports from a

adduser(8): send email improvements

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Lumsden
The interface to sending new user welcome messages in adduser(8) isn't very intuitive. For example when setting up the config file using: # adduser -config_create Eventually you are asked: Send message from file: /etc/adduser.message no [no]: If you answer "yes", adduser takes your input as the