Hi,
This diffs discards frame largers than 2500 bytes.
Tested on my machine:
urtw0 at uhub0 port 2 "Realtek RTL8187B" rev 2.00/2.00 addr 2
urtw0: RTL8187B rev E, address 00:16:44:9f:76:cb
urtw0 at uhub0 port 2 "Realtek RTL8187B" rev 2.00/2.00 addr 2
urtw0: RTL8187B rev E, address 00:16:44:9f:76:
Hi,
This discards frames that are less than 0, and those
that are more than the maximum possible buffer size.
Please test.
As usual, any feedback welcomed.
Index: src/sys/dev/usb/if_upl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/if_upl.c
Hi, this diff also discards packets larger than maximum buffer size.
Please test.
Index: src/sys/dev/usb/if_urndis.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/if_urndis.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -p -r1.29 if_urndis.c
--- src/sys/
Miod pointed out a wrong variable used for axe(4) diff. Thanks.
Index: if_axe.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/if_axe.c,v
retrieving revision 1.105
diff -u -p -r1.105 if_axe.c
--- if_axe.c25 Jan 2011 20:03:35 - 1.105
Hi,
I've taken a look at the amd64 part of the diff. Comments inline.
I'm in the progress of implementing support for the remaining
architectures, if anyone could provide me with remote access that
would speed up the process.
> Delivered-To: marty...@venck.us
> Received: by 10.231.207.5 with SM
Whoops, I made some last time changes which broke big-endian systems, spotted by
Mattew.
Index: net/getaddrinfo.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c,v
retrieving revision 1.71
diff -d -u -p -w -r1.71 getaddrinfo.c
--- n
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:58:31PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:49:01 +0100
> > From: Stefan Sperling
> >
> > Marc Espie reminded me a while back that we'll also need to make sure that
> > nothing in base will suddenly start using this (e.g. code in gnu/).
>
> Well,
On Fri 2011.03.18 at 19:11 -0400, James Turner wrote:
> I was just setting up spamd in blacklist mode on the latest snap and
> discovered the man page is missing the "in" between "pass on". Diff
> attached.
thanks!
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:48:13 -0600 (MDT)
Jordan Hargrave wrote:
> This patch changes the values of boolean comparisons from 0:1 to 0:-1
> (from ACPI Spec) in order to fix an AML issue on some Asus machines.
> Please test on other machines as well to verify that hardware
> sensors/acpi/boot work p
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:06:21AM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following adds legacy MDNS lookups to libc.
>
> It adds the keyword 'mdns' to 'lookup' in /etc/resolv.conf, only names in the
> .local (MDNS domain) are looked up.
>
> A legacy lookup is how MDNS calls a simpl
> Index: src/sys/dev/usb/if_axe.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/if_axe.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.105
> diff -u -p -r1.105 if_axe.c
> --- src/sys/dev/usb/if_axe.c 25 Jan 2011 20:03:35 - 1.105
> +++ src/sys/dev/usb/i
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:48:13PM -0600, Jordan Hargrave wrote:
> This patch changes the values of boolean comparisons from 0:1 to 0:-1 (from
> ACPI Spec) in order to fix an AML issue on some Asus machines.
> Please test on other machines as well to verify that hardware
> sensors/acpi/boot work
Hi, I'm uploading the new diffs for this. It concerns
axe(4), aue(4), cdce(4), cue(4), kue(4), mos(4) and url(4).
Of these, axe(4) is the most tricky, and I'd appreciate testing
on all vaariants of axe(4).
Please test both small and large packets (NFS and SCP).
As usual,
feedback is most welcome
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:22:23 -0700
> From: Philip Guenther
>
> These headers violate POSIX namespace rules in various ways:
> - pulling in , , and
> defines names that aren't permitted.
>(seems unnecessary too; just use unsigned short/int/long long
> instead of uint16_t/uint32_t/uint64
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:49:01 +0100
> From: Stefan Sperling
>
> Marc Espie reminded me a while back that we'll also need to make sure that
> nothing in base will suddenly start using this (e.g. code in gnu/).
Well, it shouldn't be a problem if stuff in base started using this
code. But we s
This is the right thing to do.
ok
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:48:13PM -0600, Jordan Hargrave wrote:
> This patch changes the values of boolean comparisons from 0:1 to 0:-1 (from
> ACPI Spec) in order to fix an AML issue on some Asus machines.
> Please test on other machines as well to verify that
16 matches
Mail list logo