On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:19:06AM +0530, Amarendra Godbole wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently switched over to Lenovo X201 notebook, from my older X61s.
> OpenBSD worked flawlessly when I switched the harddisks (cool!). I
> recently updated the src, and rebuilt the kernel, userland, and
> xenocara (okay
Hi,
I recently switched over to Lenovo X201 notebook, from my older X61s.
OpenBSD worked flawlessly when I switched the harddisks (cool!). I
recently updated the src, and rebuilt the kernel, userland, and
xenocara (okay, I do run -current, and know the implications :-)). I
am facing two issues:
(
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:00:09AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hi
>
> Out of interest, does the same happen if you export EVENT_NOKQUEUE to
> force libevent to use poll?
>
Yes, same thing happens.
I'm considering adding a rate option so the user can specify the speed to send,
it's nicer t
currently, the USB_DEVICEINFO ioctl (used by usbdevs(8)) races against
usb device attach/detach. this is particularly problematic for device
detachment. if the ioctl is running exactly when a hub with devices
attached is removed, there's a good chance of crashing.
the following diff makes the ra
hi,
this one also looks suspicious to me...
OK?
reyk
Index: net/if_mpe.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_mpe.c,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 if_mpe.c
--- net/if_mpe.c21 Jan 2011 17:42:57 - 1.24
+++
hi,
this will plug another memleak by using m_freem() (free whole mbuf
chain) instead m_free() (free first mbuf only).
ok?
reyk
Index: net/if_trunk.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_trunk.c,v
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u -p -
hi,
the following diff allows to create a "virtual crossover" link between
two vether(4) interfaces that helps to connect two rdomains locally.
it is like a crossover cable between two virtual devices - you can
connect a vether(4) (a) with another vether(4) (b) interface that will
receive the outg
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:28:26PM +0100, Joerg Goltermann wrote:
> >Any hints which functions/code should be inspected deeply to find the leak?
>
> I think i got it, maybe we should replace some more m_free()'s
> with m_freem()'s?
>
> OK?
>
yes, absolutely, OK for the diff.
> - Joerg
>
> In
On 01/27/11 17:17, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> thib@,
>
> That's a much better suggestion, also keeping in mind what jmc@ said.
> I will send a unified diff against the following file over the
> weekend.
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/faq/faq14.html
>
> But first I will tear down the mi
On 01/27/11 09:13, Gabriel Linder wrote:
When booting 4.9-beta/amd64 without a network cable plugged, I get a
lot of splassert failures.
After changing kern.splassert to 3 I was able to get the following
trace (get with dmesg after a reboot) :
OpenBSD 4.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #786: Tue Jan 25 1
10 matches
Mail list logo