Hi
according to the IANA IPv6 Special Purpose Address Registry the prefix
2001:0002::/48 is not supposed to be routed.
Maybe its worth adding it to the example bogon filters in bgpd.conf
--- bgpd.conf.orig2011-01-19 06:04:16.0 +0100
+++ bgpd.conf2011-01-19 06:06:25.0 +010
And this is the other frequently encountered issue for people
trying to port our mg changes elsewhere. dirname and basename
are usually stupid on other platforms, modifying their input strings,
and other such silliness.
This fixes this issue by wrapping everything in allocating
routines. It requir
Over the years, I have gotten numerous mails from people having difficulty
compiling mg on other platforms. Most of these mails fall into one of two
categories:
* struct dirent problems,
* basename, dirname problems
This diff addresses the former. The essential problem is that many platforms
d
Hello tech@,
I'm working on implementing RFC6106 (IPv6 Router Advertisement Options
for DNS Configuration) in rtadvd(8).
The attached patch adds support for RDNSS (recursive DNS servers)
option. It is tested and seems to work well with rdnssd under linux. It
adds an option for /etc/rtadvd.conf t
You have been selected to participate in PAA
Research's Winter 2011 Northeast Restaurant Survey. This is your
opportunity to learn more about how other restaurants in your state, region,
and nationally are performing in the current economic environment and how
they've approached integrating te
powerful technology we've been secretly using to generate $34,138.80,
$97,125.97, $180,867.01, and even $228,059.46 per month consistently for the
last 18 months now.
Download Now : http://good-links.us/mass-money-makers.html
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:01:56PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> Index: newfs.8
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/newfs/newfs.8,v
> retrieving revision 1.68
> diff -u -p -r1.68 newfs.8
> --- newfs.8 21 Mar 2010 07:51:23 - 1.68
Yeah, nice catch on the twiddle bug. This looks pretty good. Anyone else try
it?
-kj
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Henri Kemppainen wrote:
> > Looks pretty good. I might add an undo boundary
> > around the whole thing (I note emacs doesn't do this
> > properly, at least on the version I hav
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:28:14 -0500
Okan Demirmen wrote:
> On Fri 2011.01.14 at 19:19 +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> > It took a while to figure out the sequence of events that triggered this
> > problem and there might be other ways it can be triggered. The same
> > happens if you maximize (fullsc
Hello all (again).
So here is a bit reworked patch, taking into account suggestions from
tedu@, halex@ and jmc@. Particularily, there is no more huge phrase
"This value is multiplied by the number of 512\-byte blocks in a sector
to yield the size...": just sectors being converted to (512-byte)
blo
On Fri 2011.01.14 at 19:19 +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> There's a bug in cwm that screws up alt-tab if you follow the set of events
> described in the next paragraph. To regain alt-tab functionality you need
> to jerk the mouse around to focus clients and then it usually comes back to
> its senses
On 18 jan 2011, at 00.44, Brad wrote:
> What shipped with 4.8 was incomplete. That is not in a usable state and
still
> isn't now that binaries are being built and installed. Well you have a
> different definition of what "works" means. Do we ship BIND without
> the /etc/rc start up bits and /var/
Nikon P100 USD 479 Nikon D3100 kit 18-55
USD 980 Panasonic TZ10 USD
360 Nikon D7000 Consultar Sony SR68 USD
425 Sony XR350 USD
13 matches
Mail list logo
