Workaround for data corruption issue with ALI M5229 IDE chip used with Sun Blade 100/Netra X1.

2011-01-12 Thread Brad
The following diff is ported from NetBSD (the workaround originated from OpenSolaris) to workaround the issue of data corruption with the ALI M5229 IDE chipset when using UltraDMA. Same workaround is also used by FreeBSD/Linux. This chipset is found in some sparc64 systems such as the Blade 100 and

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE "GEOPOLITICS, GEOECONOMICS AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS PROBLEMS" Saint Petersburg, Russia, March, 23-24, 2011

2011-01-12 Thread Organizing Committee
FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC b PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "GEOPOLITICS, GEOECONOMICS AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS PROBLEMS. NATO AND EU EXPANSION TO THE EAST b SECURITY PROBLEMS OF RUSSIA, CIS STATES, EUROPE AND ASIA" Saint Petersburg, Russia, March, 23-24, 2011 +7 (812) 3329469, www.geopolitika.net,

Re: ospfd - always check config file permissions

2011-01-12 Thread Martin Pelikan
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:13:14AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > Appart from my desire to kill the permission checking? > I don't see why bgpd and ospfd needs this non-unix like behaviour, > other tools like pfctl do not care. We install the file with the correct > permissions so if somebody chang

Re: ospfd - always check config file permissions

2011-01-12 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:57:59PM +0100, Martin Pelikan wrote: > Hello, > this patch makes ospfd(8) and ospf6d(8) check its config file permissions > even if run with a -n to test it. bgpd already behaves this way (changed > 6 years ago by henning@) and it's quite handy to fix the permissions whil

ospfd - always check config file permissions

2011-01-12 Thread Martin Pelikan
Hello, this patch makes ospfd(8) and ospf6d(8) check its config file permissions even if run with a -n to test it. bgpd already behaves this way (changed 6 years ago by henning@) and it's quite handy to fix the permissions while doing tests, rather than at the first production boot time :-) Any com

Re: Teach pcidump(8) about another capability

2011-01-12 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:10:58 +1100 > From: Jonathan Gray > > ok, but you should add 0x13 "Advanced Features" as well: > > http://www.pcisig.com/specifications/conventional/pci_30/ECN_Conventional_Adv_Caps_27Jul06.pdf Never seen that one. What a horrible name. Feel free to add it if you t

Solicitud de Informacion

2011-01-12 Thread El Genuino
PREMIUM PACK La Mayor Base de Datos de E-Mails jamas Recopilada Actualizada al 30 de Noviembre de 2010!!! Pedidos: (011)(15) 6249-1566 elgenu...@datafull.com Transmiti tu idea, hace conocer tus ofertas, tus productos, tus servicios o tu negocio / empresa a nada mas y nada menos que a 4.800.000 di

Re: Teach pcidump(8) about another capability

2011-01-12 Thread Jonathan Gray
ok, but you should add 0x13 "Advanced Features" as well: http://www.pcisig.com/specifications/conventional/pci_30/ECN_Conventional_Adv_Caps_27Jul06.pdf On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:44:54PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Capability 0x12 is called "SATA". I have a diff to add PCI_CAP_SATA > to pcireg

Re: Teach pcidump(8) about another capability

2011-01-12 Thread David Gwynne
ok On 12/01/2011, at 8:44 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Capability 0x12 is called "SATA". I have a diff to add PCI_CAP_SATA > to pcireg.h, but given the fact that we're in ABI lock, that'll have > to wait. But it is anyhow better to use the number of elements in the > array to decide whether we "k

Fuji S1800

2011-01-12 Thread DigitalesNet
USD359 Fujifilm FinePix s1800 Cámara digital compacta, visor electrónico / Sensor CCD de 12,20 MP efectivos / Objetivo (en 35 mm) 28,