Hi, I separated the mclgeti part from the bugfixes for PNIC. Give it a try.
Thanks
Index: src/sys/dev/ic/dc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/dc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -p -r1.121 dc.c
--- src/sys/dev/ic/dc.c 7 Sep 20
keeping a little bit of the change, i'm leaving the element expansion in
there. that's what i was really after the first time anyway.
Index: hotplug.c
===
RCS file: /home/tedu/cvs/src/sys/dev/hotplug.c,v
retrieving revision 1.10
dif
this make *hci use the dying flag in struct usbd_bus instead of one in
their own softc. struct usbd_bus is required to be the first member of
*hci_softc.
the bus' dying flag is checked in usbd_is_dying(), which is used to
let the usb stack know if the hardware is a usable.
ok?
--
jake...@sdf.l
any further thoughts on this?
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:02:41PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 08:56:38PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 08:35:00PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 08:14:24PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:04:13PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
| I can agree there's a problem here, but the fact that you're using
| hotplug to mount disks that aren't hotplugged indicates the problem is
| elsewhere. :) I don't think hotplug was supposed to be the "do random
| stuff a little bit bu
i: 3979207 8249 MSDOS
Some have smaller gaps, but it still is pleanty enough space for this.
Penned by Mark Kettenis on 20101213 14:27.51, we have:
| > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:17:26 -0500
| > From: Ted Unangst
| >
| > On Mon, Dec
On 2010/12/13 13:51, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> First of all, big thanks to Christian `naddy` who sent me a dc(4).
> I also managed to get my hands on a PNIC. This diff add mclgeti
> support plus 2 bug fixes that suppress idle timeouts, and autonegocation
> which is broken on the PNIC. As usual,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Mark Kettenis
wrote:
>> I think the solution to that is to make adding the duid to fstab work.
>> At boot, if the duid exists, it's mounted. If it doesn't, it doesn't
>> mount but also doesn't error out. This may already work even, I
>> haven't tried it.
>
> Sor
OK, if you can wait a few more hours, I will make a diff to go back
the way things came.
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:17:26 -0500
> From: Ted Unangst
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
> > A bit late to the game, but I don't really agree with Tedu that the
> > changed behaviour is an improvement. Say I have configured
> > hotplugd(8) such that it automatica
y arrive on the scene or their
backing store.
*shrug*
Penned by Ted Unangst on 20101213 14:04.13, we have:
| On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Todd T. Fries wrote:
| > I echo Mark's sentiments, though for a different reason.
| >
| > Softraid crypto volumes take time to fsck, yet are
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> I echo Mark's sentiments, though for a different reason.
>
And hot-pluggable serial devices, like GPS receivers. Some of them do
have usb serial numbers I can key on.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> I echo Mark's sentiments, though for a different reason.
>
> Softraid crypto volumes take time to fsck, yet are useful to use.
>
> In my case I can wait 20+min for my personal laptop to be useful, or I
> can wait 5min and let the rest fsck wh
ed the scripts, but would definately
prefer the prior behavior.
Thanks,
Penned by Mark Kettenis on 20101213 6:41.17, we have:
| > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:55 +0100
| > From: MERIGHI Marcus
| >
| > > That sounds good. I was aware of the change, but didn't think anybody
Whoa there. Please stop for a moment. We have converted a small
number to MCLGETI, and in almost all cases we've run into bugs.
Subtle driver bugs, hardware bugs that need workarounds, etc. etc. If
a driver is used a lot or if the number of chip variants is very
limited, we eventaully find those
First of all, big thanks to Christian `naddy` who sent me a dc(4). I also
managed to get my hands on a PNIC. This diff add mclgeti support plus 2 bug
fixes that suppress idle timeouts, and autonegocation which is broken on the
PNIC. As usual, you know who to complain to.
Index: src/sys/dev/ic/d
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Mark Kettenis
wrote:
> A bit late to the game, but I don't really agree with Tedu that the
> changed behaviour is an improvement. Say I have configured
> hotplugd(8) such that it automatically mounts things when I plug in my
> camera. Now I reboot my machine, wit
When specifying a probability attribute on a rule and the value is out of
range, pfctl reports the problem using the internal probability value, an
unsigned greater than UINT_MAX, rather than what you actually specified.
The accepted range is either a number between 0 and 1 or between 0 and 100
if
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:28:42 +0100, MERIGHI Marcus
wrote:
> mark.kette...@xs4all.nl (Mark Kettenis), 2010.12.13 (Mon) 13:41 (CET):
>> > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:55 +0100
>> > From: MERIGHI Marcus
>> > > That sounds good. I was aware of the change, but didn't think anybody
>> > > would notice
mark.kette...@xs4all.nl (Mark Kettenis), 2010.12.13 (Mon) 13:41 (CET):
> > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:55 +0100
> > From: MERIGHI Marcus
> > > That sounds good. I was aware of the change, but didn't think anybody
> > > would notice. :)
>
> A bit late to the game, but I don't really agree with T
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:55 +0100
> From: MERIGHI Marcus
>
> > That sounds good. I was aware of the change, but didn't think anybody
> > would notice. :)
A bit late to the game, but I don't really agree with Tedu that the
changed behaviour is an improvement. Say I have configured
hotplug
ted.unan...@gmail.com (Ted Unangst), 2010.12.12 (Sun) 19:10 (CET):
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:36 AM, MERIGHI Marcus wrote:
> > The behaviour change in hotplug(4)/hotplugd(8) after your commit makes
> > it more ``hot plug'', actually. What bothers me (but not many others,
> > obviously) is the fac
j...@goblin.cx (Jonathan Gray), 2010.12.11 (Sat) 23:54 (CET):
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:46:49PM +0100, MERIGHI Marcus wrote:
> > declined or forgotten?
> applied without the comments
Thanks!
Just in case you care to explain: what made you decline the comments?
> and the man page entry sorted
23 matches
Mail list logo
