Re: fdisk.8 - updated disklabel example

2010-11-17 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:40:21AM +0100, roberth wrote: > > > > > > added uid and removed rpm. > > > being a historical snapshot in time and all, i left the rest as is. > > > or would a completely new example along the lines of the old one be > > > more welcome? > > > > > > > we could update it

Re: iostat and more than one core

2010-11-17 Thread Ted Unangst
2010/11/17 Mike Belopuhov : > I think this time around it's kernel that's wrong. top(1) calls CPTIME2 > when 'ncpus > 1' to get detailed per-cpu information. CPTIME is only > valid on UP systems, but can represent an average value on MP without > having userland programs figure out whether kernel

Re: iostat and more than one core

2010-11-17 Thread Luis Useche
> I think this time around it's kernel that's wrong. top(1) calls CPTIME2 > when 'ncpus > 1' to get detailed per-cpu information. CPTIME is only > valid on UP systems, but can represent an average value on MP without > having userland programs figure out whether kernel is lying or not. > Yes, I f

Re: iostat and more than one core

2010-11-17 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 19:09 -0500, Luis Useche wrote: > (Sorry for re-posting in different list, I thought this would receive more > attention from the developers here) > > Hi Guys, > > Doing a small disk benchmark in my laptop with dd, I found that dd and > iostats were reporting different num

iostat and more than one core

2010-11-17 Thread Luis Useche
(Sorry for re-posting in different list, I thought this would receive more attention from the developers here) Hi Guys, Doing a small disk benchmark in my laptop with dd, I found that dd and iostats were reporting different numbers. To be precise, iostat was returning half of the MB/sec than dd (

Re: fdisk.8 - updated disklabel example

2010-11-17 Thread roberth
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:50:13 + Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:40:50PM +0100, roberth wrote: > > Hi, > > > > added uid and removed rpm. > > being a historical snapshot in time and all, i left the rest as is. > > or would a completely new example along the lines of the old

Re: fdisk.8 - updated disklabel example

2010-11-17 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:40:50PM +0100, roberth wrote: > Hi, > > added uid and removed rpm. > being a historical snapshot in time and all, i left the rest as is. > or would a completely new example along the lines of the old one be > more welcome? > we could update it more if there's potential

Re: update pms driver

2010-11-17 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
Add a common interface for various devices -- Alexandr Shadchin Index: pms.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pckbc/pms.c,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.14 pms.c --- pms.c 15 Nov 2010 20:25:31 - 1.14 +++ pms.

fdisk.8 - updated disklabel example

2010-11-17 Thread roberth
Hi, added uid and removed rpm. being a historical snapshot in time and all, i left the rest as is. or would a completely new example along the lines of the old one be more welcome? btw, searching for "uid" (as in the disklabel output) in the disklabel manpage and only finding it as "UID" feels un

Re: msk(4) 88E8059 support

2010-11-17 Thread Mark Kettenis
> This diff adds support for Marvell 88E8059, found in HP mini 5102. > Tested by Frans Haarman. ok kettenis@

Re: relayd(8) 'disable/enable table' support for relays

2010-11-17 Thread Patrik Lundin
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:35:11AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > Thanks, committed. It seems some more stuff was needed to make things stable. When requesting stuff from relays with disabled tables, relayd would fail with the follwing debug output: disable_table: disabled table 1 fatal: relay_fr