On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 03:10:35PM -0500, Scot Bontrager wrote:
> A less boneheaded patch. The only caller of uhci_device_setintr simply
> returns the return value upwards and it also returns USBD_NOMEM in several
> cases. So, this seems like the route of least resistance.
Perhaps that change is f
=
COLOCACION FILMS PARA VIDRIOS
Segur= idad •
Antivandalismo • Espejados Control solar •
Esmerilad= os
instalamos en: Casas, Locales, Oficinas, Barrios Privados, Depar=
tamentos,
Obras.
Abone con TARJETA DE CREDITO , consulte
financiación.Presupuestos al inst= ante
A less boneheaded patch. The only caller of uhci_device_setintr simply
returns the return value upwards and it also returns USBD_NOMEM in several
cases. So, this seems like the route of least resistance.
Thanks for the cluestick.
Index: uhci.c
=
Si no puedes visualizar correctamente este boletC-n, ver http://www.emaildigital.com.ar/link.php?M=13712&N=41&L=42&F=T>aquC-
http://www.emaildigital.com.ar/link.php?M=13712&N=41&L=44&F=T
style="font: 12px Verdana;">Pinamar - Ver todas las propiedades
http://www.emaildigital.com.ar/link.php?M=13712
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:11:04AM -0500, Scot Bontrager wrote:
> This allows me to use bluetooth again after the assertwaitok() cleanup.
[..]
> upipe->u.intr.npoll = npoll;
> upipe->u.intr.qhs =
> - malloc(npoll * sizeof(uhci_soft_qh_t *), M_USBHC, M_WAITOK);
> + malloc(npoll * sizeof(uhci_sof
Stuart, that is correct, the are in sync. Clean CVS checkouts, and
snapshots from FTP. i386 builds do not show this problem.
--peter
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 16:14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/10/07 14:30, Peter Bisroev wrote:
>> This problem comes up in 4.8-current snapshot from 2010.
Thanks Henning! Please let me know what testing I can help with.
--peter
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 04:07, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Stuart Henderson [2010-10-07 22:17]:
>> On 2010/10/07 14:30, Peter Bisroev wrote:
>> > This problem comes up in 4.8-current snapshot from 2010.10.04 and
the
>> >
This allows me to use bluetooth again after the assertwaitok() cleanup.
Index: uhci.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/uhci.c,v
retrieving revision 1.83
diff -u uhci.c
--- uhci.c 20 Sep 2010 06:54:10 - 1.83
+++ uhci.c 8 Oct 2010
Nikon P100 USD
519 Nikon L110 USD
360,40 Nikon L21 USD
143,10
Disestablish interrupts if attach fails and bails out. Interrupts
appear to be disabled until we no longer bail out because of errors.
Is this right?
-m.
Index: ehci_pci.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/ehci_pci.c,v
retrieving
* Stuart Henderson [2010-10-07 22:17]:
> On 2010/10/07 14:30, Peter Bisroev wrote:
> > This problem comes up in 4.8-current snapshot from 2010.10.04 and the
> > -current from CVS dated 2010.10.06. When performing tcpdump on pflog0
> > the output complains about unaligned packets and do
bb
12 matches
Mail list logo