On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:45:48PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 04:12:20AM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 02:50:54AM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:42:35PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 03:35:33AM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> I got this after a while:
>
> panic: softraid0: sr_crypto_finish_io
I see the same panic in the latest amd64 snapshot.
panic: softraid0: sr_crypto_finish_io
Stopped at Debugger+0x5: leave
ddb{0}> trace
Debugger() at Debugger+
I got this after a while:
panic: softraid0: sr_crypto_finish_io
No serial, so there's no more info. You know where to find me
Hi.
Try to catch more places where we sleep and are not allowed.
One thing of note, msleep() is missing in this diff, but there
it is needed to call to sleep_setup routines with the mutex
held, and after we release it we _will_ sleep so a sleep there
with another mutex held will be caught by the
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 15:10:56 Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 06:53:33PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > this reads fine and works fine for me
> >
> > although i don't really agree with all this return () and comment
> > changing.. if everyone did that there would be to
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 06:53:33PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> this reads fine and works fine for me
>
> although i don't really agree with all this return () and comment
> changing.. if everyone did that there would be tons of unnecessary
> changes, the existing style is fine... but anyway,
this reads fine and works fine for me
although i don't really agree with all this return () and comment
changing.. if everyone did that there would be tons of unnecessary
changes, the existing style is fine... but anyway, meh, the diff works
cheers
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 04:12:20AM +0600, Alex
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 02:50:54AM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:42:35PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:40:37PM +0400, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Paul Irofti proposed to split the diff in a few easy steps.
> > > Ste
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:42:35PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:40:37PM +0400, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Paul Irofti proposed to split the diff in a few easy steps.
> > Step 1 - merge drivers pms and pmsi.
> >
>
> Step 2 - cleanup, standardization o
First: double checking is far from bad,
second: a test is much faster than a function call.
On 09/28/10 13:40, Vladimir Kirillov wrote:
Hello, t...@!
Subj, cpu_unidle() does that check itself.
Index: i386/machdep.c
===
RCS file: /
Poštovani,
Top-Shop.rs super ponude za zdraviji E>ivot vaE>e još samo 2 dana.
PoE>urite da iskoristite povoljnosti koje vaE>e do 1. oktobra - veE>bajte
i hranite se zdravo... Jednostavno - brinite o sebi!
â¢
Proverite koja iznenaDenja smo Vam pripremili uz Ab Tronic X2 i Cardio
Twister- samo
I have been running with this for months and would like to revive the
idea. This adds a workq for all IO handling in softraid crypto and raid
1. This fixes the violation of VOP_STRATEGY being called from interrupt
context.
I plan on doing something more sophisticated at a later point that would
/usr/src/sbin/init/init.c: In function 'new_session':
/usr/src/sbin/init/init.c:867: warning: implicit declaration of function 'err'
Trivial diff following:
Index: init.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/init/init.c,v
retrieving revision
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:31:30AM +0900, Hiroki Suenaga wrote:
> Can we assume m0 have at least sizeof(struct pipex_gre_header) bytes?
> If m0 is too short, m_coypdata() will cause panic.
>
> I'm not sure, but to check m_pktlen is safe.
It is save because pipex_pptp_userland_lookup_session() is
14 matches
Mail list logo
