PERD?N

2010-09-24 Thread Ministerios
Mail para ser visto con conexisn, si no puede verlo, click aqum [IMAGE] Si usted no esta interesado en recibir mas informacisn proporcionada por Feedback, Agencia de Prensa, envmenos un e-mail indicando " Remover" de la Lista "Prensa y Difusisn" a prensafeedb...@gmail.com Nuevamente disculpe por

gcc4 cross builds (patch)

2010-09-24 Thread Dale Rahn
The following diff should fix most of the cross build issues seen on gcc4 platform targets i386 and amd64 hosts can now compil macppc and sparc64 amd64 can compile i386 target i386 cannot compile amd64 target (dunno yet) Native builds have been tested for i386, amd64 and macppc. Any comments? I

Re: de-static uvm_swap

2010-09-24 Thread Marco Peereboom
Kill em dead On Sep 24, 2010, at 17:33, Thordur Bjornsson wrote: > and I'd like to kill these to: > > > Index: uvm_pdaemon.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_pdaemon.c,v > retrieving revision 1.55 > diff -u -p -r1.55 uvm_pda

Re: de-static uvm_swap

2010-09-24 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:33:28PM +, Thordur Bjornsson wrote: > and I'd like to kill these to: I"m fairly sure I did both of these diffs once (before c2k9), so sure. destatic away. OK. -0- > > Index: uvm_pdaemon.c > === > RCS f

Re: de-static uvm_swap

2010-09-24 Thread Thordur Bjornsson
and I'd like to kill these to: Index: uvm_pdaemon.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_pdaemon.c,v retrieving revision 1.55 diff -u -p -r1.55 uvm_pdaemon.c --- uvm_pdaemon.c 14 Oct 2009 17:53:30 - 1.55 +++ uvm_pdaemon.

Re: de-static uvm_swap

2010-09-24 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 08:01:19PM +, Thordur Bjornsson wrote: > Hi, > > hitting some panics coming through the swap code and it is a bit > annoying having them not show up in the ddb trace. > > OK ? I hate static for the same reason, and I'm pretty sure we are still anti-static

Re: fuser(1): -MN are also extensions to POSIX

2010-09-24 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:32:00PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote: > The fuser(1) man page mentions that -ks are extensions to POSIX. This is > true, but so are -MN; add them. > > (Compare e.g. > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/fuser.html.) > > Joachim > fix

de-static uvm_swap

2010-09-24 Thread Thordur Bjornsson
Hi, hitting some panics coming through the swap code and it is a bit annoying having them not show up in the ddb trace. OK ? Index: uvm/uvm_swap.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_swap.c,v retrieving revision 1.97

fuser(1): -MN are also extensions to POSIX

2010-09-24 Thread Joachim Schipper
The fuser(1) man page mentions that -ks are extensions to POSIX. This is true, but so are -MN; add them. (Compare e.g. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/fuser.html.) Joachim Index: fuser.1 === R

typo in flash.c and GENERIC

2010-09-24 Thread r
zaurus is complaining... Index: GENERIC === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/zaurus/conf/GENERIC,v retrieving revision 1.79 diff -u -p -r1.79 GENERIC --- GENERIC 23 Sep 2010 16:21:47 - 1.79 +++ GENERIC 24 Sep 2010 13:52:5

Re: merge pms and pmsi + added support for some of mouse

2010-09-24 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
Hi! Paul Irofti proposed to split the diff in a few easy steps. Step 1 - merge drivers pms and pmsi. -- Alexandr Shadchin Index: distrib/notes/sparc64/hardware === RCS file: /cvs/src/distrib/notes/sparc64/hardware,v retrieving revi

Re: hash.h diff

2010-09-24 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:25:54PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > When compiling ospfd I get following warning: > /usr/include/sys/hash.h: In function 'hash32_stre': > /usr/include/sys/hash.h:104: warning: cast discards qualifiers from > pointer target type > > The following diff seems to fix this.

Re: Testers needed for strict locking diff; esp i386, amd64, softraid

2010-09-24 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:49:01PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > I'd like to commit this. I've received positive reports from a few > amd64 users and an i386 and softraid user, and all of the locking bugs > exposed so far have already been fixed. > > I plan to remove the "#define panic()" hacks

hash.h diff

2010-09-24 Thread Claudio Jeker
When compiling ospfd I get following warning: /usr/include/sys/hash.h: In function 'hash32_stre': /usr/include/sys/hash.h:104: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type The following diff seems to fix this. OK? -- :wq Claudio Index: sys/hash.h ===

Reminder: friends invited you to join Select2gether.

2010-09-24 Thread Lucia Bassano
Dear Tech, Lucia Bassano sent a request to add you as a contact on Select2gether. Just a friendly reminder to join Lucia Bassano's network, follow the link below: Join Lucia Bassano's Network Thanks, Lucia Bassano You can remove yourself from Lucia Bassano's network at any time. If you

gencat.c - else if

2010-09-24 Thread Mark Lumsden
This diff removes an "} else if {" which is split over two lines. The logic of the if statement suggests to me that there was no missing "{". There is no other change apart from moving white space, so no functional difference. ok? -mark Index: gencat.c

no delayed ACKs on loopback

2010-09-24 Thread Claudio Jeker
In short this makes TCP over loopback go wroom wroom. Delaying ACKs on loopback is the cause that in certain situations no packets flow until we hit a timeout (around 1 second). This mainly affects request/respose protocols (like iscsi). -- :wq Claudio Index: tcp_input.c ===

fake state

2010-09-24 Thread Henning Brauer
those freaking code pathes for stateless are annoying as hell and tend to be buggy since everybody does stateful anyway... so here's the deal: always get us a state back when we actually pass the packet, but don't link it into the state table. late in pf_test throw it away if we want stateless. mak

Re: the right spot for ifa_add...

2010-09-24 Thread Henning Brauer
I'd really like more and heacy testing on this. has the potential for a great speedup on boxes with many IPs. * Henning Brauer [2010-09-23 13:51]: > oups, one superfluous check forgotten to remove. > > note to self: in main tree on anakin (ryan sez it's the next level of > krautcomputing) > >

Re: Testers needed for strict locking diff; esp i386, amd64, softraid

2010-09-24 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:49:01PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > I'd like to commit this. I've received positive reports from a few > amd64 users and an i386 and softraid user, and all of the locking bugs > exposed so far have already been fixed. It's already exposed bugs in limited testing, so

Re: cac(4) iopoolification again

2010-09-24 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:55:35AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > Move cac(4) to iopool and eliminate XS_NO_CCB. Tests sought. You > have been warned. > > Ken Better version that remembers to assign sc_link->pool. Ken Index: dev/ic/cac.c =

Re: Testers needed for strict locking diff; esp i386, amd64, softraid

2010-09-24 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:49:01PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > I'd like to commit this. I've received positive reports from a few > amd64 users and an i386 and softraid user, and all of the locking bugs > exposed so far have already been fixed. > > I plan to remove the "#define panic()" hacks