Greetings,
>From brad, remove superfluous braces.
Index: src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p -r1.96 xl.c
--- src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c 7 Sep 2010 16:21:43 - 1.96
+++ sr
Greetings,
>From bryan, fix tabs around while loop.
Index: src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p -r1.96 xl.c
--- src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c 7 Sep 2010 16:21:43 - 1.96
+++
Greetings,
Thanks bryan for testing it !
I've applied the necessary changes.
Here it is:
Index: src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p -r1.96 xl.c
--- src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c 7 Se
This is nice, there are some minor issues with the diff.
* The xl_fill_rx_ring function body uses spaces instead of tabs.
* Around -1125,11 +1138,11, you insert a few tabs unnecessarily.
* ..and around -1195,12 +1182,14, within the while loop, spaces.
* For the header patch, more spaces.
I am see
M
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
1.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
2.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
3.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:55:08PM -0400, Anders Langworthy wrote:
> I couldn't find clarification on this in the manpages and it seems to
> be a common misconception. Perhaps a note like the following would be
> beneficial? (Apologies for gmail line mangling)
>
hi. a tweaked version of your dif
Greetings,
I've cleaned the diff a bit based on feedback from sthen@ & b...@.
Here it is:
? xl.diff
Index: xl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p -r1.96 xl.c
--- xl.c7 Sep 2010 16:21
Sorry for that last msg.
Chris.
Sent from one of many mobile devices.
Please excuse everything about this message: formatting, spelling, content &
most especially, its author.