On 09/14/10 02:14, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Not to mess with ifconfig's wpapsk, this diff does instead introduces
> wpapass and -wpapass.
>
> Same nwid relation as before:
> - A nwid is required prior to supplying a passphrase to wpapass.
> - If the nwid is changed afterwards, the passkey is not ad
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:48:59AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like these two and have tweaked them a bit.
>
> Joachim Schipper wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:49:58PM +0200:
>
> > The first diff changes the last example in find(1). This diff:
> > - makes it clear that it, in fact,
On 2010/09/14 01:48, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
I like most of this, one thing though,
> +This is dangerous in conjunction with
> +.Xr xargs 1 ,
> +see
> +.Sx CAVEATS .
This is also dangerous when using the output in some other
ways, e.g.: rm `find . -name *.jpg`
> @@ -637,6 +646,24 @@
> and
> .Ql
This is just like the mips64 code.
Index: arcbios.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/sgi/stand/boot/arcbios.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 arcbios.c
--- arcbios.c 22 Jul 2009 20:23:44 - 1.12
+++ arcbios.c 1
There is a mistake with the comment beside the promiscuous mode flag
in nxe(4).
Index: if_nxe.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_nxe.c,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -p -r1.61 if_nxe.c
--- if_nxe.c19 May 2010 15:27:
This quiets the compiler quite a bit.
ok?
Index: Makefile.inc
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/sgi/stand/Makefile.inc,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 Makefile.inc
--- Makefile.inc14 May 2009 18:57:41 - 1.5
OLACAKSA EN ]Y]S] OLACAK,
OLACAKSA ''C]P]ES'' OLACAK..
225 $ + MONTAJ
7 En son teknoloji ile geli~tirilmi~, 10 y}l sonras} d|~|n|lerek
haz}rlanm}~ olacak..
7 Real time (gergek zamanl}) takip yapabilecek..
3 saniyede bir gergek zamanl} t
Not to mess with ifconfig's wpapsk, this diff does instead introduces
wpapass and -wpapass.
Same nwid relation as before:
- A nwid is required prior to supplying a passphrase to wpapass.
- If the nwid is changed afterwards, the passkey is not adjusted.
There has been discussion whether we should
Hi,
I like these two and have tweaked them a bit.
Joachim Schipper wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:49:58PM +0200:
> The first diff changes the last example in find(1). This diff:
> - makes it clear that it, in fact, works on all files *under* (not just
> "in") the current working directory;
>
I don't have any actual interest in the change myself, nor the time to
test it, but now at least the diff has the fixes I expected to see
regarding my prior concerns.
/Alexander
On 09/13/10 19:50, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Again,
>
> as I was pointed out the patch was borked, and actually do
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 04:15:29PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> >> I wasn't aware of any problems with suspend. My laptop doesn't resume
> >> reliably anyway, so it's not something I tested for. But it's just
> >> running some code in a tim
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Alexander Hall wrote:
>> I wasn't aware of any problems with suspend. My laptop doesn't resume
>> reliably anyway, so it's not something I tested for. But it's just
>> running some code in a timeout. If timeouts are still running during
>> suspend, I'd say that'
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:49:58PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> Here are two diffs to find(1).
>
> The first diff changes the last example in find(1). This diff:
> - makes it clear that it, in fact, works on all files *under* (not just
> "in") the current working directory;
that seems cl
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:29:19PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:18:10AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > I don't like detach. bioctl is a generic tool and the intent of that
> > command is to "delete" a logical disk of a "controller". The fact that
> > softraid detac
Again,
as I was pointed out the patch was borked, and actually documentation missing,
here is a new one, including the documentation.
Sebastian
On Monday, September 13, 2010 18:26 CEST, Sebastian Reitenbach
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached a new revision of the patch. Please comment, and let me
On 2010/09/15 00:31, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> Here's the diff:
Diff doesn't apply; both due to whitespace issues (xclip might
help with this) and if you're using thunderbird to send then
please disable format=flowed.
Greetings,
With help from dlg@, claudio@, oga@, miod@ & @weerd, I've been trying to
write
to get mclgeti support for xl(4).
It's been working fine on -current for quite some time.
I've tried flooding it with tcpbench, ping -f, and siege.
I'm looking for feedback on how I can improve it.
Her
Hi,
attached a new revision of the patch. Please comment, and let me know
whether its OK to add or still sth. wrong.
thanks,
Sebastian
Alexander Hall wrote:
> On 09/12/10 18:20, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>
>> -table *tbl = (hdr->do_err ? r->err_headers_out : r->headers_out);
>> +tab
sure.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:29:19PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:18:10AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > I don't like detach. bioctl is a generic tool and the intent of that
> > command is to "delete" a logical disk of a "controller". The fact that
> > softrai
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:18:10AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I don't like detach. bioctl is a generic tool and the intent of that
> command is to "delete" a logical disk of a "controller". The fact that
> softraid detaches the disk is a side-effect. On mfi, for example, that
> is a pretty
I don't like detach. bioctl is a generic tool and the intent of that
command is to "delete" a logical disk of a "controller". The fact that
softraid detaches the disk is a side-effect. On mfi, for example, that
is a pretty destructive command.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Jason McI
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:00:47PM -0700, Chris Palmer wrote:
> Jason McIntyre writes:
>
> > ok, my diff below tries to collect the various bits of feedback. stuff i
> > haven't taken:
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> > - delete -> detach, for reasons given by marco
>
> I'd still like to reconsid
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:55:17AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:15:01PM -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
> > On 09/09/10 20:37, d...@mindrot.org wrote [lightly edited]:
> > > $ touch foo.orig foo.rej
> > > $ find . -type f -name \*.orig -or -name \*.rej
> > > ./foo.orig
> > >
Meh. Code has changed a lot since then and we should just raise them
all and see if this is still an issue.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:52:31PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> last time i tried this i caused weird issues on people using the
> SPI variants of mpi(4).
>
> this restricts the large numb
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:52:31PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> last time i tried this i caused weird issues on people using the
> SPI variants of mpi(4).
>
> this restricts the large number of openings to the SAS or FC mpi(4)
> variants, both of which i have succesffully tested myself.
>
> ok?
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:00:47PM -0700, Chris Palmer wrote:
> Jason McIntyre writes:
>
> > ok, my diff below tries to collect the various bits of feedback. stuff i
> > haven't taken:
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> > - delete -> detach, for reasons given by marco
>
> I'd still like to reconsid
OLACAKSA EN ]Y]S] OLACAK,
OLACAKSA ''C]P]ES'' OLACAK..
225 $ + MONTAJ
7 En son teknoloji ile geli~tirilmi~, 10 y}l sonras} d|~|n|lerek
haz}rlanm}~ olacak..
7 Real time (gergek zamanl}) takip yapabilecek..
3 saniyede bir gergek zamanl} t
On newer ASUS boards the way the aibs(4) sensors are accessed got changed.
So some system will show this:
aibs0 at acpi0
aibs0: TSIF not found
aibs0: FSIF not found
aibs0: VSIF not found
aibs0: no sensors found
The following diff adds support for those systems (using GGRP, GITM to
enumerate and po
Visitez le portail officiel du Gouvernement de Ctte d'Ivoire, Cliquez ici (
"http://www.gouv.ci"; )
( "http://www.gouv.ci"; )
COMMUNIQUE DE LA COMMISSION ELECTORALE INDEPENDANTE
(C.E.I)
DELIVRANCE DES C.N.I AUX POPULATONS IVOIRIENNES POUR LES PROCHAINES ELECTIONS
( "http://www.gouv.ci/c
Hi,
thanks for taking a look.
On Sunday 12 September 2010 09:33:44 pm you wrote:
> On 09/12/10 18:20, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > -table *tbl = (hdr->do_err ? r->err_headers_out : r->headers_out);
> > +table *tbl;
> > +switch (hdr->inout) {
> > +case hdrs_out:
> > + tbl =
last time i tried this i caused weird issues on people using the
SPI variants of mpi(4).
this restricts the large number of openings to the SAS or FC mpi(4)
variants, both of which i have succesffully tested myself.
ok?
Index: mpi.c
===
31 matches
Mail list logo
