Hello,
this is a new version based on corrections by henning@ with few more
things added.
I'm not sure whether the type changes in pfvar.h won't break anything,
but it would be nice to have the types uniform.
Any comments or suggestions?
--
Martin Pelikan
Index: net/pf.c
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:49:06 -0600
> From: Theo de Raadt
>
> > > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:30:42 +0100
> > > From: Stuart Henderson
> > >
> > > running with this seems to help.
> >
> > Can you try this diff instead?
> >
> > Index: if_vr.c
> > =
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:23:09PM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Alf Schlichting wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:58:08AM +0300, Oleksii Zhmyrov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I use OpenBSD -current on my desktop with Xfce4.
> > > With Option "UseSIGI
If you have PCMCIA cards which cause ``CIS checksum failed'' messages to
appear when inserted, please try the following diff and let me know if
the message disappears.
And if you have PCMCIA cards which do not cause the checksum failed
message to appear, please try this diff anyway and let me know
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:53:44PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> The following diff adds support for PCMCIA cards with indirect CIS data
> (the regular CIS data only contains a device tuple and an ``indirect''
> tuple).
Errm, I just put one of those in a computer museum.
I've asked, if they're not
2010/9/1 Owain Ainsworth
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Alf Schlichting wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:58:08AM +0300, Oleksii Zhmyrov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I use OpenBSD -current on my desktop with Xfce4.
> > > With Option "UseSIGIO" "false" xserver refuses to start at
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:39:52PM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 06:30:05 -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:35:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> [...]
> > > However, using this option, after starting firefox everything gets
> > > extremely lagg
The following diff adds support for PCMCIA cards with indirect CIS data
(the regular CIS data only contains a device tuple and an ``indirect''
tuple).
These cards currently aren't recognized correctly and ``attach'' as
this:
com3 at pcmcia0 function 0: can't allocate i/o space
If you have such pc
Hello tech@
I've noticed different behavior of pf rule counters between IPv4 and
IPv6. The easiest ruleset would look like:
block
match on em0 inet6 tag potazmo
match on em0 inet tag ausfahrt
pass on em0 from any to any tagged potazmo
pass on em0 from any to any tagged ausfahrt
where ping4s are c
Add const keyword to pointers that point to strings which shouldn't be changed
and remove blankline from usage().
ok?
-mark
Index: stat.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/stat/stat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 stat.
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 06:30:05 -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:35:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
[...]
> > However, using this option, after starting firefox everything gets
> > extremely laggy, and I can interact with my machine with the keyboard or
> > mouse wit
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:35:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 23:31:25 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The Xorg xserver runs a scary amount of code in a signal handler.
> > It's supposed to make your mouse cursor move more smoothly, but I
> > can't spot the difference when
On 01/09/2010, at 8:13 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: David Gwynne
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:35:15 +1000
>>
>> On 01/09/2010, at 7:30 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> I realise you committed this already, but can you elaborate on those
>>> XXX's in there?
>>
>> these two?
>
> yes
>
>> +if (b
> From: David Gwynne
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:35:15 +1000
>
> On 01/09/2010, at 7:30 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > I realise you committed this already, but can you elaborate on those
> > XXX's in there?
>
> these two?
yes
> + if (bq->bufq_outstanding == 0 /* XXX and quiesced */)
> +
On 01/09/2010, at 7:30 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I realise you committed this already, but can you elaborate on those
> XXX's in there?
these two?
+ if (bq->bufq_outstanding == 0 /* XXX and quiesced */)
+ SLIST_FOREACH(bq, &bufqs, bufq_entries) { /* XXX */
the first one refers to t
> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:26:14 +1000
> From: David Gwynne
>
> this diff is largely a mechanical change.
>
> firstly, it makes struct bufq a member of the softc for devices
> that use it, rather than it being a pointer to something that needs
> to be allocated at attach. since all these device
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 23:31:25 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The Xorg xserver runs a scary amount of code in a signal handler.
> It's supposed to make your mouse cursor move more smoothly, but I
> can't spot the difference when I disable that "feature". Instead,
> this "feature" breaks certain m
On 2010/08/31 23:59, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:30:42 +0100
> > From: Stuart Henderson
> >
> > running with this seems to help.
>
> Can you try this diff instead?
It is surviving ok with this diff.
> Index: if_vr.c
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
