Re: Looking for testers for a simple X test

works fine here under -current thinkpad x61, no changes. 2010/8/30 Mark Kettenis : > The Xorg xserver runs a scary amount of code in a signal handler. > It's supposed to make your mouse cursor move more smoothly, but I > can't spot the difference when I disable that "feature". Instead, > this "fe

Re: Backout mclgeti for vr(4).

> > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:30:42 +0100 > > From: Stuart Henderson > > > > running with this seems to help. > > Can you try this diff instead? > > Index: if_vr.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_vr.c,v > retrieving revis

Re: Backout mclgeti for vr(4).

> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:30:42 +0100 > From: Stuart Henderson > > running with this seems to help. Can you try this diff instead? Index: if_vr.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_vr.c,v retrieving revision 1.105 diff -u -p -

Te Regalamos la CCNA

Si no puede ver este Newsletter correctamente, o desea ver la version HTML completa presione en el SIGUIENTE LINK - Te regalamos l

Re: Looking for testers for a simple X test

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:56 PM, patrick keshishian wrote: >> Option "UseSIGIO" "false" > dependent and that this option in general should only be used > as a work-around to a bug until fixed. That's what we're doing. But since X is never going to fix the bug, that's a long until.

Re: Backout mclgeti for vr(4).

running with this seems to help. Index: if_vr.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_vr.c,v retrieving revision 1.105 diff -u -p -r1.105 if_vr.c --- if_vr.c 19 May 2010 15:27:35 - 1.105 +++ if_vr.c 31 Aug 2010 21:30:

Re: Looking for testers for a simple X test

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Alf Schlichting wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:58:08AM +0300, Oleksii Zhmyrov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I use OpenBSD -current on my desktop with Xfce4. > > With Option "UseSIGIO" "false" xserver refuses to start at all. > > > > Same here, segmentation

Re: Backout mclgeti for vr(4).

On 2010/08/30 23:46, Thordur I Bjornsson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 06:46:53PM -0400, Brynet wrote: > > Evening, > > > > I have two machines with vr(4) interfaces running 4.7, and I can't seem > > to find any problem running ping -f against them. > > > > vr0 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 "VIA V

Re: Looking for testers for a simple X test

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> How can you tell whether this option is turned on by default >> or not? xorg.conf(5) indicates that the default is platform >> dependent and that this option in general should only be used >> as a work-around to a bug until fixed. > > The X

Conseil des Ministres du 26 Août 2010

Visitez le portail officiel du Gouvernement de Ctte d'Ivoire, Cliquez ici ( "http://www.gouv.ci/"; ) ( "http://www.gouv.ci/"; ) CONSEIL DES MINISTRES Conseil des Ministres du 26 Ao{t 2010 Le Conseil des Ministres s'est tenu le jeudi 26 ao{t 2010, de 13H15mn `14H30 mn au Palais de la Pr

Re: stat.c remove unused variable

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 07:29:16AM +, Mark Lumsden wrote: > Remove unused variable, linkfail. Unused since v1.6. > > ok? > > mark > yup, it should have been removed in 1.6, ok gilles@ > Index: stat.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/s

Re: carpdev behavior is inconsistent on failover

Hi Claudio, > Yes, since you disconnected the link between the carp interfaces without > dropping their physical connections both will become MASTER. > This normaly results in havoc since bad luck will flow all traffic to the > wrong box. This is the typical problem with too much redundancy (the >

sys/videoio.h cleanup

sys/videoio.h defines anonymous unions. these aren't standard C, and gcc-<3 does not support them. this diff simply names the anonymous unions 'un'. there is also a diff for the 4 ports affected by this change. video(1) can presumably be re-enabled in xenocara and removed from ports. while her

Re: ACPI systems without legacy mode

Now that release is done I am not opposed to this. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 03:58:43PM +0200, Niklas Hallqvist wrote: > On 08/08/10 12:18, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:57:20 +0800 > >> > >> Is there someone who would be willing to test this diff on a physical > >> machine th

Re: ACPI systems without legacy mode

On 08/08/10 12:18, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:57:20 +0800 >> >> Is there someone who would be willing to test this diff on a physical >> machine that currently reports "ACPI control unavailable" in dmesg, >> e.g. >> >> acpi0 at bios0: rev 2, ACPI control unavailable > I'm pr

Re: Looking for testers for a simple X test

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:58:08AM +0300, Oleksii Zhmyrov wrote: > Hi, > > I use OpenBSD -current on my desktop with Xfce4. > With Option "UseSIGIO" "false" xserver refuses to start at all. > Same here, segmentation fault. I am on a radeon card too, x1950 with a ca. 1 week old x11. snipplet fro

Re: Backout mclgeti for vr(4).

On 2010/08/30 20:20, Marco Peereboom wrote: > My vr on my firewall hangs for a while until the watchdog kicks it in > the pants every time I push a little traffic through it. I'd love to > see thibs thing go in. Does thib's diff help this?

Re: carpdev behavior is inconsistent on failover

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:49:17PM -0400, Peter Bisroev wrote: > Hi All, > > I have tried searching the mailing lists but did not seem to find the > answer to the issue that I am seeing. I apologize for the long email, > but more info is better than less :) > ... > For the tests performed all s

Re: Looking for testers for a simple X test

Hi, I use OpenBSD -current on my desktop with Xfce4. With Option "UseSIGIO" "false" xserver refuses to start at all. Xorg.0.log file is quite long, so i place it on FTP: ftp://93.188.35.221/pub/uploads/Xorg.0.log $ sysctl kern.version kern.version=OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENERIC.MP) #2: Sun Aug 29

stat.c remove unused variable

Remove unused variable, linkfail. Unused since v1.6. ok? mark Index: stat.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/stat/stat.c,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -p -r1.15 stat.c --- stat.c 29 Jun 2010 20:51:05 - 1.15 +++ stat