Vous pouvez aussi remplir le formulaire de prise de contact en cliquant ICI
Toutes les marques cities sont diposies par leurs propriitaires respectifs,
AM Entertainment Groupe n'agit pas pour le nom ou pour le compte des iditeurs
ou fabriquants mais pour son propre compte.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:02:35PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
>> > Side note: the complain is also pointless because a modified algorithm
>> > wouldn't be interoperable anyway, making
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:02:35PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:37:21PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> >> On Monday 19 July 2010 18:26:15 Ted Unangst wrote:
> >> > Free software you can't modify is not free so
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:37:21PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
>> On Monday 19 July 2010 18:26:15 Ted Unangst wrote:
>> > Free software you can't modify is not free software.
>
> Algorithm != implementation (== software).
>
>> That's espe
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:37:21PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On Monday 19 July 2010 18:26:15 Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Free software you can't modify is not free software.
Algorithm != implementation (== software).
> That's especially galling for software where there are real security
> considera
> > Free software you can't modify is not free software.
>
> That's especially galling for software where there are real security
> considerations: suppose you find a flaw in the algorithm--you can't
> fix it?
This is just like Stanford and Tom Wu with their SRP patents.
It's free. Really. Jus
On Monday 19 July 2010 18:26:15 Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Yoshisato YANAGISAWA
>
> wrote:
> >> Not to mention there are software patent claims againt camellia. That's
> >> a no go right there.
> >
> > OpenBSD has already included Camellia source code as a part of OpenS
> Free software you can't modify is not free software.
This is totally true. We've been here before.
Please get this situation resolved.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Yoshisato YANAGISAWA
wrote:
>> Not to mention there are software patent claims againt camellia. That's
>> a no go right there.
>
> OpenBSD has already included Camellia source code as a part of OpenSSL. It
> is disabled by default, though.
> At the time OpenSSL i
Hello e3h&e ee-8g?f3h.d=
e1,e9e-8f e*h&1600ehttp://urloid.com/yahoo29,
I found free information on undefined at Math.com. Check it out!
The URL is: 1
E-Mail me at jdi...@yahoo.com and let me know what you think.
- e3h&e eh(f6f3g62g+
**Please Note**
This email was
Hi,
missing letter here...
Index: arch/i386/i386/trap.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/trap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.93
diff -r1.93 trap.c
176c176
< frame->tf_trapno, frame->tf_err, frame->f_eip,
---
>
>> And if I use the DLV anchor, domains under .org TLD are not
>> reachable (because, if I understand correctly, the key is signed
>> with RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 and Bind-9.4 doesn't support it).
You're lucky that an error raised for you. I had to stop using DNSSEC
because of misinterpretation NSEC3 t
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 07:45:28PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm doing some testing with DNSSEC now that root are signed but it
> seems BIND-9.4.2-P2 (provided with OpenBSD 4.7) is not able to load
> the trust-anchor :
>
> Jul 18 19:35:22 rb600a named[11605]: loading configurat
Hello all,
I'm doing some testing with DNSSEC now that root are signed but it seems
BIND-9.4.2-P2 (provided with OpenBSD 4.7) is not able to load the
trust-anchor :
Jul 18 19:35:22 rb600a named[11605]: loading configuration from
'/etc/named.conf'
Jul 18 19:35:22 rb600a named[11605]: /etc/nam
Meet.Learn.Grow. Cincinnati. July 20th, 9:00 - 11:00 AM
Last Chance to Register!
Tickets are free, but pre-registration is required.
Meet.Learn.Grow - Cincinnati is a business networking event being held on July
20th from 9-11 AM at Champps Americana in West Chester. If you are a business
ow
Yoshisato YANAGISAWA wrote:
> Will you try my following patch to enable the Camellia block cipher on
> OpenSSH? The Camellia block cipher is one of the approved encryption
> method in European Union (NESSIE) and Japan (CRYPTREC) as well as has
> been specified in several Internet RFCs. It is al
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Yoshisato YANAGISAWA wrote:
> OpenBSD has already included Camellia source code as a part of OpenSSL. It is
> disabled by default, though.
> At the time OpenSSL included Camellia, NTT had shown following news release:
> http://www.ntt.co.jp/news/news01e/0104/010417.html
>
>
2010/7/18 Yoshisato YANAGISAWA :
> "other people use it" shows that the algorithm is well-tested.
> I know AES is also approved cipher of NESSIE. However, I see some reasons
> to believe Camellia is better than AES.
> - Full spec. Camellia 128bits, 192bits, and 256bits are not broken yet.
> Whil
18 matches
Mail list logo
