Re: Adding support for Roland UA-25EX Audio I/F

2010-07-09 Thread Denis Fondras
Hello Jacob, Le 05/07/2010 03:40, Jacob Meuser a icrit : from what I see, it has a standards compliant mode and an advanced mode, and there is a button on the back to turn off advanced mode. you'll almost assuredly need to turn advanced mode off. You were absolutely right :) Turning off adv

Re: /boot broken on latest snapshot ?

2010-07-09 Thread Josh Elsasser
On 2010-07-09 14:01:41, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On 07/09/10 14:19, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just upgraded to the very latest snapshot(9.7. 1:50) on i386. Now my > > system does not boot anymore. The only thing I get is: > > > > Using drive 0, partition 3. > > Loading.

Test: ACPI PCI _PRT bus fix

2010-07-09 Thread Jordan Hargrave
This diff fixes a panic seen on Dell PEx9xx servers with the new ACPI PCI mapping. The _INI code was resetting the _ADR to 0x on some systems if the PCI bus does not exist. This caused the pci_make_tag to panic as dev/fn were 0x. The second change is in acpiprt.. a panic was put in

Fix GPROF build

2010-07-09 Thread Luis Henriques
This patch fixes an error when building the kernel with GPROF. Here's the error: 1: warnings being treated as errors ../../../../kern/subr_prof.c:102: warning: no previous prototype for 'sysctl_doprof' ../../../../kern/subr_prof.c: In function 'sysctl_doprof': ../../../../kern/subr_prof.c:112: w

Re: Call for testing: IPsec diff (2nd update)

2010-07-09 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:26:22PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > (1) I think a number of unrelated changes in if_bridge.c, like the > one above, snuck in. > > (2) Works for me. > this is an updated diff; no functional changes just without the unrelated bridge stuff and adjust to curre

Još samo 2 dana ekstra povoljan šoping!

2010-07-09 Thread Top Shop
PoÅ¡tovani, Fudbalsko prvenstvo se bliE>i kraju, zato poE>urite... JoÅ¡ samo 2 dana je ostalo da iskoristite svoj popust! Air Sofa Bed uz 10% popusta D eka na Vas, kao i Quelle letnja kolekcija uz fantastiD ne cene niE>e D ak 40%! • Super udobna sofa 5 u 1... Od sofe, do braD nog kreveta! â€

Re: Call for testing: IPsec diff (update)

2010-07-09 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:26:22PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Reyk Floeter wrote: > > > --- net/if_bridge.c 2 Jul 2010 02:40:16 - 1.181 > > +++ net/if_bridge.c 3 Jul 2010 17:22:52 - > > @@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ u_int8_t bridge_filterrule(struct brl_he > > struct mbuf *bridge_f

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-09 Thread Marc Espie
Obvious stupidity fixed... On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:35:05AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > I remember why I did not do it before... there is a technical. > The way we build FULLPKGNAMEs with the interaction with flavors makes this > rather awkward. > > Anyways, my make-fu did improve markedly since

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-09 Thread Marc Espie
I remember why I did not do it before... there is a technical. The way we build FULLPKGNAMEs with the interaction with flavors makes this rather awkward. Anyways, my make-fu did improve markedly since last time I tried, so this ought to do the trick. If you get a headache while reading this, you'

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-09 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Marc Espie: > As far as naming goes, are you okay with REVISION(-sub) and EPOCH(-sub) ? Sure. The exact name doesn't matter. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-09 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:22:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> I think both sthen@ and I have mentioned before that we really like >> how FreeBSD has the revision in a separate PORTREVISION variable >> that is much easier and less erro

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-09 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:22:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > I think both sthen@ and I have mentioned before that we really like > how FreeBSD has the revision in a separate PORTREVISION variable > that is much easier and less error prone to increment than pX > suffixes in PKGNAME. > >

Re: OpenBSD closes TCP connections between unrelated hosts

2010-07-09 Thread Patrick Coleman
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > We need to make sure it does not break something. This diff can affect > both bridge(4) and trunk(4) so both setups need to be tested with > various setting of promisc interfaces. I've done some performance testing for various combinations