Hello Jacob,
Le 05/07/2010 03:40, Jacob Meuser a icrit :
from what I see, it has a standards compliant mode and an advanced mode,
and there is a button on the back to turn off advanced mode. you'll
almost assuredly need to turn advanced mode off.
You were absolutely right :)
Turning off adv
On 2010-07-09 14:01:41, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> On 07/09/10 14:19, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just upgraded to the very latest snapshot(9.7. 1:50) on i386. Now my
> > system does not boot anymore. The only thing I get is:
> >
> > Using drive 0, partition 3.
> > Loading.
This diff fixes a panic seen on Dell PEx9xx servers with the new ACPI PCI
mapping.
The _INI code was resetting the _ADR to 0x on some systems if the PCI
bus
does not exist. This caused the pci_make_tag to panic as dev/fn were 0x.
The second change is in acpiprt.. a panic was put in
This patch fixes an error when building the kernel with GPROF. Here's the
error:
1: warnings being treated as errors
../../../../kern/subr_prof.c:102: warning: no previous prototype for
'sysctl_doprof'
../../../../kern/subr_prof.c: In function 'sysctl_doprof':
../../../../kern/subr_prof.c:112: w
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:26:22PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> (1) I think a number of unrelated changes in if_bridge.c, like the
> one above, snuck in.
>
> (2) Works for me.
>
this is an updated diff; no functional changes just without the
unrelated bridge stuff and adjust to curre
Poštovani,
Fudbalsko prvenstvo se bliE>i kraju, zato poE>urite... Još samo 2 dana je
ostalo da iskoristite svoj popust!
Air Sofa Bed uz 10% popusta D
eka na Vas, kao i Quelle letnja kolekcija
uz fantastiD
ne cene niE>e D
ak 40%!
â¢
Super udobna sofa 5 u 1... Od sofe, do braD
nog kreveta!
â
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:26:22PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
> > --- net/if_bridge.c 2 Jul 2010 02:40:16 - 1.181
> > +++ net/if_bridge.c 3 Jul 2010 17:22:52 -
> > @@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ u_int8_t bridge_filterrule(struct brl_he
> > struct mbuf *bridge_f
Obvious stupidity fixed...
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:35:05AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> I remember why I did not do it before... there is a technical.
> The way we build FULLPKGNAMEs with the interaction with flavors makes this
> rather awkward.
>
> Anyways, my make-fu did improve markedly since
I remember why I did not do it before... there is a technical.
The way we build FULLPKGNAMEs with the interaction with flavors makes this
rather awkward.
Anyways, my make-fu did improve markedly since last time I tried, so this
ought to do the trick.
If you get a headache while reading this, you'
Marc Espie:
> As far as naming goes, are you okay with REVISION(-sub) and EPOCH(-sub) ?
Sure. The exact name doesn't matter.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:22:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> I think both sthen@ and I have mentioned before that we really like
>> how FreeBSD has the revision in a separate PORTREVISION variable
>> that is much easier and less erro
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:22:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I think both sthen@ and I have mentioned before that we really like
> how FreeBSD has the revision in a separate PORTREVISION variable
> that is much easier and less error prone to increment than pX
> suffixes in PKGNAME.
>
>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> We need to make sure it does not break something. This diff can affect
> both bridge(4) and trunk(4) so both setups need to be tested with
> various setting of promisc interfaces.
I've done some performance testing for various combinations
13 matches
Mail list logo