Curso 'Reparacion de Equipos PCs e Introduccion a Redes'

2010-06-01 Thread acp015
El C l u b de Programadores- Asociacion Civil, invita a participar del curso 'Reparacion de Equipos PCs e Introduccion a Redes' que se dictara los dias Miercoles de 18:30 a 21:30 hs. a partir del 09 de Junio de 2010, en Auditorio Congreso, Entre Rios 166 1- Temario a desarrollar 2- Datos del instr

Re: Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Tim van der Molen
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:24:24 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-06-01 21:14, Tim van der Molen wrote: > > It seems gcc parses the += statement wrongly: "a += b == c" should be > > interpreted as something like "(a = a + b) == c", but instead gcc seems > > to interpret it as "a = (a + b == c)".

Re: Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Sviatoslav Chagaev
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:28:18 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Tim van der Molen wrote: > > Would this be a bug in gcc or am I overlooking something? > > == has a higher precendence than += and therefore binds stronger. > See operator(7). > > Joerg > Wo

Re: Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Sviatoslav Chagaev
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:14:53 +0200, Tim van der Molen wrote: > I'm running i386 -current of 13 May and ran into surprising behaviour > from gcc. Consider the following code snippet: > > int i; > > i = 1; > if (i += 1 == 2) > printf("%d; should be 2\n", i); > >

Re: Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Tim van der Molen wrote: > I'm running i386 -current of 13 May and ran into surprising behaviour > from gcc. Consider the following code snippet: > > int i; > > i = 1; > if (i += 1 == 2) > printf("%d; should be 2\n", i); >

Re: Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Eric Faurot
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Tim van der Molen wrote: > I'm running i386 -current of 13 May and ran into surprising behaviour > from gcc. Consider the following code snippet: > > int i; > > i = 1; > if (i += 1 == 2) > printf("%d; should be 2\n", i); >

Re: Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Hyjial Irldar
+= has lower priority than (+= and = have the same priority, in fact) == thus i += 1 == 2 means i += ( 1 == 2), which is i += 0 -> i == 1 Cheers ! hyjial

Re: Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Nikolai Fetissov
> I'm running i386 -current of 13 May and ran into surprising behaviour > from gcc. Consider the following code snippet: > > int i; > > i = 1; > if (i += 1 == 2) > printf("%d; should be 2\n", i); > > i = 1; > if ((i += 1) == 2) > printf("%d;

Re: Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Tim van der Molen wrote: > Would this be a bug in gcc or am I overlooking something? == has a higher precendence than += and therefore binds stronger. See operator(7). Joerg

Bug in gcc 3?

2010-06-01 Thread Tim van der Molen
I'm running i386 -current of 13 May and ran into surprising behaviour from gcc. Consider the following code snippet: int i; i = 1; if (i += 1 == 2) printf("%d; should be 2\n", i); i = 1; if ((i += 1) == 2) printf("%d; should

Seeqpod is now Bloson: Listen to unlimited music

2010-06-01 Thread Bloson.com
Troubles reading this email? try viewing it in a browser. [IMAGE] Unlimited music and more! Hi there, As a former seeqpod user, you are receiving this personal invitation to use bloson.com. Now you will be able to continue listening to your favorite songs like One Love and Sun Is Shining by Bo

Elevaplacas de Durlock y Herramientas - tech

2010-06-01 Thread Jorge Mitre
HERRAMIENTAS PARA LA CONSTRUCCION Y MAS * ANDAMIOS TUBULARES * ACCESORIOS DE SEGURIDAD * CABALLETES EXTENSIBLES * ELEVADOR PARA PLACAS DE DURLOCK O KNAUF * ESCALERAS TIPO BURROS * TORRES DE ELEVACION DE MATERIALES * TRIBUNAS Y GRADAS * CARROS RECOLECTORES * VALLAS CERRAMIENTOS *

Webinars, Moodle, Gerencia de e-Learning

2010-06-01 Thread Net-Learning
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message correctly.