> However, I'm just going to upgrade to OpenBSD 4.7 and because of the new
> pf syntax I have to "convert" my configurations. It's not a big deal
> except for one thing.
> I didn't find the replacement for the "no nat" statement.
> How is that supposed to be specified now?
pass quick.
you don't n
Eu tava morrendo de saudades de voce, entaum preparei uma mensagem bem
legal, Foi de coracao!
Espero que voce goste, um abraco e espero resposta viu?
Abrir
Hi everybody,
I'm not that sure this is the right mailing list which I can post this
message. The misc sounds too generic and hopefully the tech is not
supposed to receive such a trivial question.
However, I'm just going to upgrade to OpenBSD 4.7 and because of the new
pf syntax I have to "convert
V_ker jai v_koi,
Sar e}wolai ma ]wete ]ma |loqvo tqi^leqo cel\to cak^mg, gqel_a jai v~tisg
stir jaqdi]r jai tir xuw]r sar.
Avieq~ste k_ca deuteq|kepta jai apoka}ste to pam]loqvo jai paqajimgtij|
b_mteo : http://www.akis-angelakis.com/greek/FreeStuff.aspx?Productid=352
Le vikijo}r waiqetislo}r,
