Hace de tu cumple una fiesta

EsteViernes 21- Sabado 22 - Domingo 23 y Lunes 24 de Mayo en la Divina San Telmo B o?= Canilla libre de cerveza +o?=Pizzas libres (5 variedades artesanales) o?= Empanadas caseras o?= Ademas te regalamos una Remera, Consumiciones sin cargo para vos y Listas Free para todos tus amigos o?=

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:42:09PM -0600, Ted Roby wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Owain Ainsworth wrote: > > > > > I was referring to which of the three drm commits on the 10th. > > > > > Oh. They were all applied. > Unfortunately, I built everything late that night and early on the 11t

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Owain Ainsworth wrote: > > I was referring to which of the three drm commits on the 10th. > > Oh. They were all applied. Unfortunately, I built everything late that night and early on the 11th. So, I never determined which patch caused it. I was watching with grea

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:02:42PM -0600, Ted Roby wrote: > > > > There were three, could you confirm which one you mean? > > > > > (II) Loading extension GLX > (II) LoadModule: "intel" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/ > drivers//intel_drv.so > (II) Module intel: vendor="X.Org Foundation" >

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Owain Ainsworth wrote: > > > absinthe-minded? > > > > Hard to get decent Absinthe in the UK, i'm afraid. > > Sorry. > > There were three, could you confirm which one you mean? > > (II) Loading extension GLX (II) LoadModule: "intel" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/mod

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Mon, 17 May 2010 22:16:54 +0100 Owain Ainsworth wrote: > The diff found at http://xenocara.org/xvmc.diff could do with some > testing. > > This is some stuff that I didn't backport back to 2.9.1 when I did the > intial intel driver backport pile. This contains a huge cleanup of the > XVMC cod

Publicitar tu producto nunca fue tan facil

Untitled Document No te lleva tiempo de armado de campaa No te preocupas por el diseo Las campaas son creadas por expertos Recibs los resultados por email sin tener que esforzarte Las consultas que hagan por tu producto lle

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:40:23AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010 22:16:54 +0100 Owain Ainsworth > wrote: > > For those of you new here, or termnally adsent minded, instructions > > follow: > > > > You've got be careful with those "termnally adsent" folks. ;) Feh, typo ;). >

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:01:29AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:40 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 May 2010 22:16:54 +0100 Owain Ainsworth > > wrote: > > > For those of you new here, or termnally adsent minded, instructions > > > follow: > > > > > > > You've got be

je je 1985 ne pe 4 mi

http://HICKS7725.makesboyscrazy.com/list.html

Re: move klist to process

On Mon, 17 May 2010 21:08:05 -0400 (EDT) Ted Unangst wrote: > This moves the knote list to struct process for better process > semantics with rthreads. It should have little noticeable effect > otherwise, but I've been wrong about simpler diffs before > It has no noticeable effect on i386,

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, 18 May 2010 07:40:23 -0700 "J.C. Roberts" wrote: > It seems to become enabled, but really doesn't do anything. > > (II) intel(0): DPMS enabled > (==) intel(0): Intel XvMC decoder disabled copy-n-paste snafu. should read "enabl

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:52:11 +0200 David Coppa wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, J.C. Roberts > wrote: > > > Whether enabled or disabled in xorg.conf, (so far) it seems to have > > no effect on the occasional/intermittent screen corruption bug seen > > by dcoppa (915GM) and me (845G). >

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:40 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010 22:16:54 +0100 Owain Ainsworth > wrote: > > For those of you new here, or termnally adsent minded, instructions > > follow: > > > > You've got be careful with those "termnally adsent" folks. ;) > > absinthe-minded? > >

ULTIMAS VACANTES! Charla gratuita de marketing digital

Publicidad: TALLER GRATUITO PARA EMPRESAS " NUEVAS TENDENCIAS DE MARKETING EN INTERNET, LA WEB 2.0" - ULTIMAS VACANTES - CIERRE DE INSCRIPCION: MIERCOLES 19/05/2010 13:30 Hs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sepa csmo converti

Re: $LINENO in trap

> Comments? > <...snip...> After a quick read, it looks good to me, but I've not built it and tested it because I don't have access to my openbsd system at the moment.

$LINENO in trap

My first patch that solves this : http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yes&numbers=6195 Comments? Index: history.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/history.c,v retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -p -r1.38 history.c --- hi

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote: > Whether enabled or disabled in xorg.conf, (so far) it seems to have no > effect on the occasional/intermittent screen corruption bug seen by > dcoppa (915GM) and me (845G). The occasional/intermittent screen corruption bug seems to have disa

Ο Τύπος της Κατοχής

[IMAGE] Am jat\ k\hor ^qhe s' es\r, aut| to l^mula, paqajak~ apamt^ste lar le tgm ]mdeing DIACQAVG. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of typos-katoxhs_small.jpg]

Re: (another) Intel driver change needs testing.

On Mon, 17 May 2010 22:16:54 +0100 Owain Ainsworth wrote: > For those of you new here, or termnally adsent minded, instructions > follow: > You've got be careful with those "termnally adsent" folks. ;) With the 845G and a minimal xorg.conf (only "NoTrapSignals") I get the expected: (II