Hah. No worries; I'm just glad that I wasn't too terribly off-base.
:-) I can be available for testing if needed.
Thanks!
--seth
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> It is a known issue, I actually had pulled the code for inet_net_pton()
> from NetBSD many
2010/4/30, Rod Whitworth :
> Quite often we have people wanting a home firewall and these folk are the
> ones who will rarely do binat.
> Besides that all the examples of NAT in the pf.conf
> manpage and the upcoming pf FAQ use the match action without ever
> explaining why. (I'll get onto Nick in
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:56:46 +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 05:36:35PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> there is no mention of the "pass out on $ext_if nat-to 1.2.3.4" way of
>> doing NAT in the pf.conf manpage for a "vanilla" firewall. There is one
>> use of the construct but
