oops.
sorry. i did not re-compile mysql and other tool. (pthreads vs
rthreads result are same)
so, previous e-mail's performance test is fail.
i'll update test tools and i'll send that results again.
thanks.
2010/4/13 Ted Unangst :
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Jung wrote:
>> rthreads vs p
Hi,
[ still appropriate for tech@ ? ]
[ Cc: list clipped - we are all on tech@, anyway, aren't we? ]
On Tue, 13.04.2010 at 11:10:00 +0100, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> flow esp in from 0.0.0.0/0 to somenetwork/24 type bypass
> flow esp out from somenetwork/24 to 0.0.0.0/0 type bypass
> flow esp in
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Jung wrote:
> rthreads vs pthreads performance test
>
> at today, i did test recent rthreads performance.
> previous e-mail http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=120634514721997
> rthreads performance was poor. but recent rthreads performance good like
> below.
>
> s
Top Shop
I Vi se prirpemate za proleDno veliko spremanje?
Ne oD
ajavajte! UD
inite to bez previše napora za upola kraDe vreme - napravite
svoj paket!
Veliko spremanje
Akcija proleDnog spremanja Vam donosi:
â
Odaberite bilo koja 2 ili više proizvoda iz ponude proizvoda za
D
išDenje is
PQP0P2P>P2P0Q P?P>PQ Q:
P P5P3P8QQQP0QP8Q PPP, PPP, PP, PP, PP P>Q 3500
QQP1P;P5P9
PP=P5QP5P=P8P5 P8P7PP:QPQ 4500 QQP1P;P5P9
PP5QP5QP5P3P8QQQP0QP8Q, QP5P>QP3P0P=P8P7P0QP8Q,
P;P8P:P2P8P4P0QP8Q P>QP3P0P=P8P7P0QP8P9.
P"QQP4P>P2P>P5 P?QP0P2P>
PQQP>P:P8
On 2010/04/13 10:24, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Working:
>
>
> flow esp in from 172.18.100.139 to 0.0.0.0/0 peer 87.186.99.179 srcid
> gatewayip/32 dstid uf...@example.com type use
> flow esp out from 0.0.0.0/0 to 172.18.100.139 peer 87.186.99.179 srcid
> gatewayip/32 dstid uf...@example.com
On Thu, 08.04.2010 at 08:52:12 +0100, Mark Lumsden wrote:
> You want a yay? Give me a yay:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=127071264614038&w=2
>
> aka: disklabel - 'P' option
Ok, here you are: "yay"...
> fairs fair.
??
Kind regards,
--Toni++
rthreads vs pthreads performance test
at today, i did test recent rthreads performance.
previous e-mail http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=120634514721997
rthreads performance was poor. but recent rthreads performance good like below.
some test result on Core 2 Duo + 4.7-Current(GENERIC.MP)+RTHRE
Hi Damien,
On Tue, 13.04.2010 at 12:10:27 +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > with your comments, I have produceds a second version of the patch,
> > which includes the following changes:
>
> IPsec isn't really my area, but some questions:
>
> 1) Why are t