On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 04:35:53PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> Here is a diff to copy over a few of the changes made to snapper(4)
> by todd@ and jakemsr@ awhile ago over to tumbler(4). As you can
> see it has been sitting for awhile. I haven't had relevent hw
> in quite some time, so instead of this sitt
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 03:37:46PM +1030, Matthew Haub wrote:
> We no longer track upstream less(1). The last sync was 7
> years ago.
Nicholas Marriott asked:
> Yes, but is that for a reason or just because nobody has
> updated it?
Han Boetes replied
| Because everybody uses w3m to replace less a
A few minutes ago, I wrote
> I also don't see w3m as making lynx obselete:
> * lynx is in base; w3m isn't
> * lynx doesn't load images, so malicious images (e.g., ones containing
> buffer-overflow exploits for some image library) won't affect it;
> lynx has options to support displaying inline
Here is a diff to copy over a few of the changes made to snapper(4)
by todd@ and jakemsr@ awhile ago over to tumbler(4). As you can
see it has been sitting for awhile. I haven't had relevent hw
in quite some time, so instead of this sitting on my hd for longer
I'm sending this out for testing and s
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:45:42PM +0200, Simon Bertrang wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:09:48PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > I've been using this a few times, and it's really useful for tweaking
> > big makefiles in ports, or very compact for other stuff.
> >
> > It's like this, both our make
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:33:56PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Above switch statement doesn't conform with style(9). Also
> it is missing "break;".
Here is the updated patch conforming to style(9).
Thank you,
Matthew
Index: edit.c
==
