On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 02:23:35PM +0930, Matthew Haub wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:41:56AM +0930, Matthew Haub wrote:
> > The following patch fixes ksh autocomplete support for files within
> > directories containing []:`$= characters. This also fixes the problem
> > ray@ was ex
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:41:56AM +0930, Matthew Haub wrote:
> The following patch fixes ksh autocomplete support for files within
> directories containing []:`$= characters. This also fixes the problem
> ray@ was experiencing with the back quotes in PR user/6006.
Here's the same patch wi
Hello,
The following patch fixes ksh autocomplete support for files within
directories containing []:`$= characters. This also fixes the problem
ray@ was experiencing with the back quotes in PR user/6006.
Matthew
Index: edit.c
===
R
virtualize your brain. it is nice.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Zachary Uram wrote:
> I have never run OpenBSD before and want to try it out. Wondering if
> there is an ISO I can run in VirtualBox? If not what is the
> recommended method for users who wish to run OpenBSD in
> virtualization?
>
Yeah I had a think about the wording as well and the only thing I could
come up with was putting "Device reports" before both messages from
smartstatus and that isn't that helpful.
The man page seems pretty clear to me already, not sure it needs to be
changed.
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:37:43AM
Thanks for the explanation. That was the information I was searching for.
The drive has failures (writing is very slow) and the smartstatus check does
not reveal the problem.
Therefore, I would prefer to keep the extra-checking of readattr in future and
ignore the "intelligent" decision the drive
Buenas tardes, tech@openbsd.org
?Azn no ingresa al Directorio de Paginas Amarillas Internet? ?Quiere vender
mas? ?Ganarle a la competencia?
Miles de visitantes consultan el Directorio a diario. NO es Telefsnica! Es el
mayor portal Dinamico de Argentina.
En caso de no visualizar el newsletter por
On 2010/04/03 07:51, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Maybe the message in one or other of the cases should be different?
The message in readattr is slightly different as it talks about
values; I've tried a few other wordings but none have really improved
clarity. I'd be more in favour of adding a short
Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 03:37:46PM +1030, Matthew Haub wrote:
> > We no longer track upstream less(1). The last sync was 7
> > years ago.
>
> Yes, but is that for a reason or just because nobody has
> updated it?
Because everybody uses w3m to replace less and lynx nowada
