Para visualizar esta mensagem, use um programa de
e-mail compativel com html!
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:56:27PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
>
> And this is exactly the problem with POSIX.
>
> When was that change made?
It is the same kind of requirement as ISO C99 has for size_t. The
primary header for size_t is stddef.
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:27:27PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > That said, sys/types.h is most likely not what is needed to
> > > make sys/mman.h self-contained, but that's a completely
> > > separate issue.
> >
> > By the way, where is it written that sys/mman.h has to be
> > self-containe
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 07:27:27PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > That said, sys/types.h is most likely not what is needed to
> > make sys/mman.h self-contained, but that's a completely
> > separate issue.
>
> By the way, where is it written that sys/mman.h has to be
> self-contained?
>
> I bet
> That said, sys/types.h is most likely not what is needed to
> make sys/mman.h self-contained, but that's a completely
> separate issue.
By the way, where is it written that sys/mman.h has to be
self-contained?
I bet it is written exactly the other way around.
> It might be surprising, but for any semi-modern version of GCC
> applying the patch and compiling
>
> #include
> #include
>
> doesn't result in significant IO change compared to the unpatched
> version. The compiler is smart enough to recognise the normal include
> guard style and won't touch
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:38:14PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:57:43 Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > > In OpenBSD, we usually include headers in other headers if that
> > > is required by a relevant standard, in particular by POSIX.
> >
> > I don't know where you get
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:57:43 Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > In OpenBSD, we usually include headers in other headers if that
> > is required by a relevant standard, in particular by POSIX.
>
> I don't know where you get this idea from. Theo has made it pretty clear
> in the past that what you
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:57:43 Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> In OpenBSD, we usually include headers in other headers if that
> is required by a relevant standard, in particular by POSIX.
I don't know where you get this idea from. Theo has made it pretty clear
in the past that what you said above
Ave, dear
Ill let you go to the whims of fate...
If I were to kiss your luscious lips and drink of them their wine I will
love you more and ask you to be mine. If you were to hold me in your arms
and rock me off to sleep, I will lay there all night long. I'll say that
"I am yours to keep" We w
Christopher Zimmermann wrote on misc@, Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:53:28PM +0100:
> I just got some errors while trying to compile ptlib:
>
> error: type specifier omitted for parameter `size_t'
> [...]
>
> They resulted from size_t not being defined in sys/mmap.h
I guess you are talking about .
>
If you have problems viewing this message, click below:
http://www.magnetmail.net/actions/email_web_version.cfm?recipient_id=18203973
8&message_id=940223&user_id=Lebhar_ENT&group_id=265098
Thousands of products for operators! Sales leads for suppliers!
If you haven't visited www.Anything4Restau
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:56:40PM +0100, Martin Hedenfalk wrote:
> This fixes the documentation to conform to the code.
>
> -martin
>
fixed, thanks.
jmc
> Index: usr.sbin/snmpd/ber.3
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/snmpd
Hi!
Thanks to all who have replied.
I'm really baffled with this. I've upgraded to a more recent snapshot,
and it has gone away since. However I'm not really sure that the error was in
the previous
snapshot, in fact it was probably a PEBKAC, but I've no idea what could've been
the problem.
Anywa
14 matches
Mail list logo
