On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:15:17PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following
> "glitch" I'm seeing with ksh in `set -o vi' mode:
>
> Demonstration of "glitch":
> $ touch a.c a.h
> $ ls a.
> ls: a.: No such file or directory
>
I wonder if included patch is a correct fix for the following
"glitch" I'm seeing with ksh in `set -o vi' mode:
Demonstration of "glitch":
$ touch a.c a.h
$ ls a.
ls: a.: No such file or directory
$
a.c a.h
$
With patch:
$ ls a.
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, lars wrote:
> Adding the -l argument to assign user name on sftp is done on ssh and makes
> the two more similar to use. The diff below is an illustraion of what might
> be done.
No, -l is reserved for bandwidth limiting like scp's -l option. This should
be coming soon - I h
As before, with iostat fix and man page for netstat.
Index: usr.bin/netstat/if.c
===
RCS file: /home/tedu/cvs/src/usr.bin/netstat/if.c,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -r1.61 if.c
--- usr.bin/netstat/if.c4 Aug 2009 03:45:47
Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> What I wanted was a simpler way of controlling the basic features of the
> device.
Yes, but what you failed to comprehend is that these devices are very
complex, it is not easy to "define" the basic features of the device
because there are many devices in different vendor-im
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:29:08 +0100
Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
> OK, I got the feedback I wanted. Thanks all. I'll continue
> hating mixerctl(1) and hope something more sane show up in
> the future ;-)
>
That was a bit harsh. I do actually like mixerctl(1) for simpler
devices, like my uaudio(4) hea
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:54:21AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:28:38AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Jacob Meuser
> > wrote:
> > >> If you don't like mixerctl, there's at least a half dozen mixers in
> > >> ports.
> > >
> > > those don't
