Re: Signal handling question

2009-10-24 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:05 AM, patrick keshishian wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 03:50:17PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: ... >> @@ -298,7 +298,9 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) >> act.sa_flags = SA_RESTART; >> act.sa_handler = onsig; >> for (i

:: Sitios Web para PYMES desde 120.000 ::

2009-10-24 Thread :: Renueve su sitio Web ::
PLAN E-POWER : SITIO ADMINISTRABLE * Ideal para Empresas que necesitan de un potente y moderno sitio administrable con grandes posibilidades de interaccion con sus clientes y con una capacidad de expansion casi ilimitada. * Permite disponer de una potente vitrina y canal de comunicacion, con la

Importante comunicacion con Amenitie Solutions

2009-10-24 Thread Amenities
A nuestros Clientes , Amigos , y futuros contactos con nuevas empresas en el rubro hoteleria , les informamos que Amenitie Solutions tiene por norma contestar los mails recibidos en no mas de 24 hs , por eso solicitamos que de no ser asi tengan a bien reenviar sus inquietudes o por favor comunicars

Reply..........

2009-10-24 Thread Harry Barnes
Hello, This is Harry Barnes of the 1st Battalion Scots Guard, but redeployed to Iraq, and presently stationed in Mushirij South West of Basra. I will like to share some very vital information that would bring some good financial returns to us in just a few weeks or days depending on how fast we

Re: 4.6 compile messages: Do I have to worry?

2009-10-24 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 05:51:28PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > today I compiled 4.6-stable from source on an amd64 machine, and got a > lot of error messages like this (sample): > > About 20 or so of these: > > lint -hx -I/usr/src/lib/libm/arch/amd64 -I/usr/src/lib/libm/src > -I/usr/s

4.6 compile messages: Do I have to worry?

2009-10-24 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, today I compiled 4.6-stable from source on an amd64 machine, and got a lot of error messages like this (sample): About 20 or so of these: lint -hx -I/usr/src/lib/libm/arch/amd64 -I/usr/src/lib/libm/src -I/usr/src/lib/libm/src/ld80 -i /usr/src/lib/libm/src/s_conj.c /usr/include/complex.h:43

Re: SiS190 driver: How to do pci_get_device and pci_read_config_byte

2009-10-24 Thread Henning Brauer
* Christopher Zimmermann [2009-10-24 14:57]: > Yes, I read something about "mbuf cluster" is the comments. As I > understand the manpages this means the mbufs are chained together using > the m_hdr.mh_next pointer !? But as far as I understand the code in > sis_newbuf() it uses the MH_dat.m_ext. I

Re: SiS190 driver: How to do pci_get_device and pci_read_config_byte

2009-10-24 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
thanks for the fast replies. I believe you helped me very much to look in the right direction. On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:19:58 +0200 Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 01:56:51PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > > panic: pool_do_get(mbpl: free list modified > > Free list modified me

Re: SiS190 driver: How to do pci_get_device and pci_read_config_byte

2009-10-24 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 01:56:51PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > Hello again! > > In porting this SIS191 driver from freeBSD I'm stuck trying to fix a > kernel panic in pool_do_get: > > panic: pool_do_get(mbpl: free list modified > Free list modified means that you hit a use after free

Re: SiS190 driver: How to do pci_get_device and pci_read_config_byte

2009-10-24 Thread Henning Brauer
* Christopher Zimmermann [2009-10-24 14:04]: > In porting this SIS191 driver from freeBSD I'm stuck trying to fix a > kernel panic in pool_do_get: > > panic: pool_do_get(mbpl: free list modified > > trace: > panic() > pool_do_get() > pool_get() > m_gethdr() > > What I don't understand is in my

Re: SiS190 driver: How to do pci_get_device and pci_read_config_byte

2009-10-24 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
Hello again! In porting this SIS191 driver from freeBSD I'm stuck trying to fix a kernel panic in pool_do_get: panic: pool_do_get(mbpl: free list modified trace: panic() pool_do_get() pool_get() m_gethdr() What I don't understand is in my driver m_gethdr(M_DONTWAIT, M_DATA) is called. Therefore