Re: OpenBSD 4.6 crashing on kernel boot due to ahci0 seemingly

2009-10-07 Thread Christophe Prevotaux
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:17:01 +0100 Owain Ainsworth wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:01:24PM +0900, Christophe Prevotaux wrote: > > Hi, > > > > My machine is Running OpenBSD/amd64 4.6 (snapshot 02 Oct 2009) > > > > > > The kernel crashed on AHCI detection. > > > > ahci0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0

bge(4) diff for BCM5717 support.

2009-10-07 Thread Brad
The following diff adds support for the Broadcom BCM5717 ASIC and the BCM5717 / BCM5718 chipsets. Index: if_bge.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_bge.c,v retrieving revision 1.284 diff -u -p -r1.284 if_bge.c --- if_bge.c7 O

Re: cwm(1) change on 9/25

2009-10-07 Thread Simon Nicolussi
Owain Ainsworth wrote: > I can't reproduce this here, anymore details? I think I have found a way to trigger this bug reliably: Try to resize the window with the mouse to the size it would have if it was maximized (screen resolution minus gaps) and then press CM-f. Using this method I can now repr

Re: cwm(1) change on 9/25

2009-10-07 Thread Simon Nicolussi
Okan Demirmen wrote: > i haven't experienced this (yet) - does this still occur if you simply > backout the change? No, no problem at all with revision 1.64 of client.c. -- Simon Nicolussi, http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/~csag9583/

Lebanon, Thailand, Cyprus Opportunities for Investors

2009-10-07 Thread Top Executives in the Gulf
You are seeing this message in Text format. if your email is in the junk folder, add the sender email to your address book and move this email into your inbox to view the HTML version.

Re: FW: Broadcom BCM5787

2009-10-07 Thread Brynet
Daniel Rapp wrote: > Anybody have any ideas ? otherwise I will have to send the machine back.. > .. > acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured > pcibios0 at bios0: rev 3.0 @ 0xf/0xdc04 > pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfda50/416 (24 entries) > pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum > pci

Re: FW: Broadcom BCM5787

2009-10-07 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:23:01 +0200 > From: "Daniel Rapp" > > Still some problems.. > > System is uppdated to current.. > > Hangs at " bge0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5787M" rev 0x02, > BCM5754/5787 A2 (0xb002)" > > > Anybody have any ideas ? otherwise I will have to send the ma

Re: FW: Broadcom BCM5787

2009-10-07 Thread Daniel Rapp
Still some problems.. System is uppdated to current.. Hangs at " bge0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5787M" rev 0x02, BCM5754/5787 A2 (0xb002)" Anybody have any ideas ? otherwise I will have to send the machine back.. " >> OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 3.02... boot> booting hd0a:/bsd: 244

Re: cwm(1) change on 9/25

2009-10-07 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Fri 2009.10.02 at 00:32 +0159, Simon Nicolussi wrote: > Hello, > > as a consequence to the last change to cwm(1) no borders are being drawn > for maximized windows. This is fine as long as there's no gap defined in > the cwmrc(5), otherwise the borders between window and gaps are missing. > Is

Re: cwm - menu pops up when clicking inside a window

2009-10-07 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Fri 2009.10.02 at 10:33 +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > Hi. > > This is not a new issue, but I thought it was about time to report it. > > Some programs will pop up the menu_unhide (launch hidden window list) > menu when being clicked certain places inside their window. Examples > are Sylpheed,

Distro Summit 2010: call for papers extended until 18 Oct 2009

2009-10-07 Thread martin f krafft
Please redistribute this call for papers. The deadline has been extended to 18 Oct 2009. === CALL FOR PAPERS === Distro Summit 2010 is a one-day technical conference with a strong focus on collaboration between Free Software distributions hosted at the linux.conf.au 2010.

Re: Difference between pf_test and pf_test6

2009-10-07 Thread Vadim Zhukov
On 7 October 2009 c. 13:38:54 Henning Brauer wrote: > * Vadim Zhukov [2009-10-07 10:30]: > > Hello all again. > > > > Could anyone explain the reasons of the following difference? More > > precisely: > > > > 1. Why does pf_test() add log flag PF_LOG_FORCE, and pf_test6() > > resets log flag to pla

Re: Difference between pf_test and pf_test6

2009-10-07 Thread Henning Brauer
* Vadim Zhukov [2009-10-07 10:30]: > Hello all again. > > Could anyone explain the reasons of the following difference? More > precisely: > > 1. Why does pf_test() add log flag PF_LOG_FORCE, and pf_test6() resets > log flag to plain 1 (PF_LOG)? i probably missed the ipvshit case when fixing t

Difference between pf_test and pf_test6

2009-10-07 Thread Vadim Zhukov
Hello all again. Could anyone explain the reasons of the following difference? More precisely: 1. Why does pf_test() add log flag PF_LOG_FORCE, and pf_test6() resets log flag to plain 1 (PF_LOG)? 2. Is diverting supported only for AF_INET? I do not see such mention in neither commit logs or p