2009/8/22 GC!bor Stefanik :
> 2009/8/21 Johannes Berg :
>> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:04 +0200, GC!bor Stefanik wrote:
>>
>>> I've reworked RTS/CTS since then, just haven't got to sending a new
>>> proposal yet. The current plan is as follows:
>>>
>>> TX_FLAGS & 0x0002: Use CTS
>>> TX_FLAGS & 0x0004:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Dieter
Holkenpolk wrote:
> Consider the shell script:
> false
> false &
> echo $?
>
> The output is 0. The ksh manual says $? is
> "the exit status of the last non-asynchronous command executed."
> What do you think?
Yeah, I think it should be changed to "the exit
Consider the shell script:
false
false &
echo $?
The output is 0. The ksh manual says $? is
"the exit status of the last non-asynchronous command executed."
What do you think?
2009/8/21 Johannes Berg :
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:04 +0200, Gabor Stefanik wrote:
>
>> I've reworked RTS/CTS since then, just haven't got to sending a new
>> proposal yet. The current plan is as follows:
>>
>> TX_FLAGS & 0x0002: Use CTS
>> TX_FLAGS & 0x0004: Use RTS
>> TX_FLAGS & 0x0020: Disable
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:04 +0200, GC!bor Stefanik wrote:
> I've reworked RTS/CTS since then, just haven't got to sending a new
> proposal yet. The current plan is as follows:
>
> TX_FLAGS & 0x0002: Use CTS
> TX_FLAGS & 0x0004: Use RTS
> TX_FLAGS & 0x0020: Disable RTS/CTS usage
Seems a bit strang
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:41 +0200, GC!bor Stefanik wrote:
> My intention with the meeting is to form an actual proposal that all
> implementors can agree on. We can produce proposals, and even new
> standardized fields to no avail, as some implementors (especially
> OpenBSD) appear to be stuck wit
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:31 +0200, GC!bor Stefanik wrote:
> Hope to see you on Freenode at the set date. Again, if the time is a
> problem, respond, and I will try to find a better time.
I don't think there's any need to have an IRC meeting. We've hashed out
the way forward multiple times on the
2009/8/21 Johannes Berg :
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:41 +0200, Gabor Stefanik wrote:
>
>> My intention with the meeting is to form an actual proposal that all
>> implementors can agree on. We can produce proposals, and even new
>> standardized fields to no avail, as some implementors (especially
>>
2009/8/21 Johannes Berg :
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:31 +0200, Gabor Stefanik wrote:
>
>> Hope to see you on Freenode at the set date. Again, if the time is a
>> problem, respond, and I will try to find a better time.
>
> I don't think there's any need to have an IRC meeting. We've hashed out
> the
Radiotap is a de-facto standard for 802.11 frame injection and reception.
Up to field ID 13, it can truly considered a standard (all current
implementations
agree on fields 1-13), but after that, implementations diverge widely.
Here is a map of how current implementations define field IDs 14 an
How do I earn cash ?
use the web as usual and earn cash - it really is that simple
click here >>>
http://microsoft-office-live.blogspot.com/2009/08/rent-your-desktop.html
Max Laier has problems getting Email through the OpenBSD MX, so I am
forwarding this for him.
- Marc Balmer
Von: Max Laier
Datum: 20. August 2009 17:33:24 GMT+02:00
An: tech@openbsd.org
Betreff: Fwd: PF fix.
The problem Pawel discovered (s.b.) still exists in OpenBSD current.
I sent
Paw
12 matches
Mail list logo
