Re: [PATCH] RFC: Changes to tcpbench.

2009-08-10 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 04:00:12AM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > looks OK to me, but are routing domains only supported for IPv4? > If so, please mention that they don't work for IPv6. > The sockopt is currently only valid for IPPROTO_IP but it will be added to IPPROTO_IPV6 as soon as we support

Re: cwmrc(5) color options

2009-08-10 Thread Edd Barrett
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:56:53PM -0400, Olivier Cherrier wrote: > > I have an expert3d card with the firmware loaded. > > Do you mean an Elite3D card? Yes. Woops -- Best Regards Edd Barrett (Freelance software developer / technical writer / open-source developer) http://students.dec.bmth.a

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Changes to tcpbench.

2009-08-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/08/10 21:59, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Claudio Jeker > > wrote: > > > +.Op Fl V Ar rdomain > > > > Out of curiosity, why V instead of R, d, or D? > > > > Because ping, traceroute, nc and t

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Changes to tcpbench.

2009-08-10 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Claudio Jeker > wrote: > > +.Op Fl V Ar rdomain > > Out of curiosity, why V instead of R, d, or D? > Because ping, traceroute, nc and telnet use -V. It was one of the only flags that is left open

Re: cwmrc(5) color options

2009-08-10 Thread Olivier Cherrier
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:51:37PM +0100, vex...@gmail.com wrote: > > Anyway, it works on sparc64 too. Good work :) > > No it doesnt. Oops :) > > When moving windows in cwm (with the mouse) on a blade 1000, bits of > other window borders get "stuck" over the window you are dragging. > > See scre

ce4231 driver WIP patch

2009-08-10 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, I have been hacking on the ce4231 driver on my sparc64 box. This patch: a) does some bits with the audio encoding (from jacob). b) fixes (almost) the mixer interface. I can't test the inputs, as it seems that part of the driver is broken or unfinished. Observe: blade% sudo aucat -f /dev/audi

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Changes to tcpbench.

2009-08-10 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote: > +.Op Fl V Ar rdomain Out of curiosity, why V instead of R, d, or D?

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Changes to tcpbench.

2009-08-10 Thread Damien Miller
looks OK to me, but are routing domains only supported for IPv4? If so, please mention that they don't work for IPv6. -d On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:08:45PM -0300, Christiano Farina Haesbaert wrote: > > I've discovered that my patch reads the wrong tcp

namecache diff - again

2009-08-10 Thread Bob Beck
After having fast recycle kick my butt for two days finding vnode reuse bugs.. here is the new diff. this does appear stable on my machines. Note that it disables some functionality in procmap, temporarily, although looking at it it may have already been pre-broken. miod has promi

Re: No More Multi Routing Table on 4.6-current?

2009-08-10 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi Claudio and tech@, On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:54:55 +0700, Stuart Henderson wrote: (moved from misc to tech) On 2009-07-07, Insan Praja SW wrote: After updating to i386 4.6-current, my multirouting tables is no longer working. I wonder if this because of the new rodomain thingy.. which is

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Changes to tcpbench.

2009-08-10 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:08:45PM -0300, Christiano Farina Haesbaert wrote: > I've discovered that my patch reads the wrong tcp table entry, as soon > as I fix this I'll mail the final patch. > I had to add rdomain support to tcpbench so that I can use it in my test setup. Diff is attached, I ho