On 7/29/09, leon zadorin wrote:
> On 7/29/09, Atle Kristensen wrote:
>
>>> > I am, at this stage of conversation (if one can call it such), noting
>>> > the difference (in my opinion) between implementation and definition
>>
>> There is ALWAYS a difference while dealing with two "languages":
>> c
On 7/29/09, Atle Kristensen wrote:
>> > I am, at this stage of conversation (if one can call it such), noting
>> > the difference (in my opinion) between implementation and definition
>
> There is ALWAYS a difference while dealing with two "languages":
> code <-> specification/documentation.
Sur
Please test the following diff to rewrite the promisc mode / multicast
handling code for the sparc hme(4) driver and is based off of the MI
hme(4) driver.
Index: hme.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/sparc/dev/hme.c,v
retrieving revi
Don't know if it makes some sense...
I thought it's more informative to say 'rip' instead of 'route' in netstat and
others. afaiu 'route' is there for historical reason, that was the name of the
first rip daemon. 'rip' represents the name of the protocol itself, without
regard to implementation nam
Simplify the ipgphy(4) attach routine a bit by making use of
mii_phy_add_media() to set the media types and adjust the
anegticks as appropriate.
>From FreeBSD
Tested by jasper@
Index: ipgphy.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/mii/ipg
Learn the best ways to make the best deals, manage risk, expand your knowledge
of specialized subjects such as property values, insurance, risk
managementb&Apply this and other skills in the financial modeling of a real
estate investment individually or within a team.
... AND THERE'S SO MUCH MORE,
> So now we can, perhaps, get back (if at all) to the man pages and what
> they are implying wrt original question.
>
> Leon.
Let me post this as a inspiration to others newcomers:
Feel free to add a patch/diff if you really feel that the manpages are not
clear enought,
let me help you on that w
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 02:10:42PM +0300, Vladimir Kirillov wrote:
> Hello, t...@!
>
> There is a diff for fork1.9 manual page. The current manual does not
> mention the latest function argument, rnewprocp
>
a tweaked version of your diff has just been committed. thanks for the
mail.
jmc
On 2009/07/27 19:23, Brad wrote:
> [[[ 540-549MB/sec before ]]]
>
> The following diff to adjust the early TX threshold needs testing
> with any re(4) adapter other than the original 8139C+. Please also
> do some performance testing if you can.
>
> Please provide a dmesg.
This seems marginally s
