On 2009-06-30 06:26:48, Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2009-06-29 22:08:00, Dale Rahn wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:46:35PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> > > The following diff adds a workaround for an issue with the VIA VT6202
> > > EHCI controller hogging the PCI bus and causing poor performance for
>
On 2009-07-22 23:18:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
> memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
> takes some effort. So please help me with getting this tested if you
> have any machines with re(4).
>
> Than
Merhaba,
Ara~t}rmadan yap}lan okul segimleri gelecepimizi depi~tiriyor!
Epitim hayat}n}z boyunca devam edecepiniz okul,dersane,|niversite,yurt ve
kurslar}n kalitesini inceleme ve deperlendirme imkan}na sahipsiniz.
NasilBir.com ile Neler Yapabilirsiniz
* Gocupunuzu dersaneye veya anaokuluna g
(Mark wrote)
>
> This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
> memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
> takes some effort. So please help me with getting this tested if you
> have any machines with re(4).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
(patch sni
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:04:39 +0200
Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> Any developer in need of an Asus WL-138gE PCI wireless adapter?
It's now taken.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/07/23 14:46, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:37:03PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > this still removes the interface info I want to see.
> > >
> > > why do you keep ignoring the advice of replaceing
Any developer in need of an Asus WL-138gE PCI wireless adapter?
bwi0 at pci2 dev 10 function 0 "Broadcom BCM4318" rev 0x02: apic 2 int 22 (irq
7), address 00:22:15:7c:4f:f0
I bought the wrong one; I was going for a WL-130N for Host AP but
apparently I made a typo. If nobody wants it, I can have
On 2009/07/23 14:46, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:37:03PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > this still removes the interface info I want to see.
> >
> > why do you keep ignoring the advice of replaceing the long
> > valid/invalid words by some kind of marker like we do in the R
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:37:03PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> this still removes the interface info I want to see.
>
> why do you keep ignoring the advice of replaceing the long
> valid/invalid words by some kind of marker like we do in the RIB?
>
> $ bgpctl sh ri as 24640
> flags: * = Vali
On 2009/07/23 12:35, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
> > memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
> > takes some effort. So please help me w
Hello, t...@!
There is a diff for fork1.9 manual page. The current manual does not
mention the latest function argument, rnewprocp
Index: fork1.9
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/fork1.9,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -N -u -p
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> This diff switches re(4) over to MCLGETI, bringing goodies like lower
> memory usage and livelock mitigation. Getting this right usually
> takes some effort. So please help me with getting this tested if you
> have any machines wi
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:59:50 -0400
Okan Demirmen wrote:
>
> I'm not quite convinced yet that these are that useful. All these
> options are global and will effect every client. The current method of
> offsetting at least gets you away from stacking windows directly on top
> of each other, along
Hi!
Here is a diff, if someone is interested, which adds a new option to rcs'
ci(1) and co(1) to preserve owner and group information across
checkins/checkouts. I was really missing this feature with config files
which have to have uid/gid other than root/wheel and needed to manage the
files as ro
14 matches
Mail list logo
