Re: add long option names to mount_nfs' man page

2009-06-25 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Jason, hi Thordur, just to warn you, i had a brief look at this, and what you have does not seem right yet. This looks like a can of worms. Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 02:11:08PM +0100: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 01:42:58PM +, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote: >> I like this a

No risk investment

2009-06-25 Thread Carrie SHAW
If you indigence to lock in a undeviating monthly income stream from your portfolio, then it's time to overlook your investments. Thanks to the introduction of a relatively new assets, there's a whole new world of monthly income just here for you. Millions of people are already using these new ways

Re: mixerctl broken for sparc?

2009-06-25 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Jacob Meuser wrote: >> Any clues what may be wrong here? I am willing to have a look at the >> code myself if no-one has any ideas. > > please do ;) B the mixer interface in audioce(4) looks sorta bogus. > I guess the driver was not really finished? B maybe the

Re: add long option names to mount_nfs' man page

2009-06-25 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 01:42:58PM +, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote: > I like this a little bit better then what was previously proposed. > > I wouldn't mind just removing the long options all togather, but I > doubt thats possible now. here's the diff then. please check the alternative option n

pflow question/problem

2009-06-25 Thread Artem Teslenko
Hi there! Please assist in resolve following problem: I've users network which using internet via openbsd gateway with configured pptp and pflow Scheme: INTERNET <-> | PPTPD + PFLOW OpenBSD gw| <-> |Clients network| pflow interface configured for sending netflow packets to another system with

Re: azalia(4) diff needs testing.

2009-06-25 Thread Brad
On Thursday 25 June 2009 02:53:47 Thomas Pfaff wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:27:50 -0400 > > Brad wrote: > > Does that say ATI or NVIDIA? > > Well, true, but he initially said "any azalia(4) adapter". > > I thought checking for regressions was important, too. My e-mail said that. Jacob's did no

Re: azalia(4) diff needs testing.

2009-06-25 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:53:47 +0200 Thomas Pfaff wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:27:50 -0400 > Brad wrote: > > > > Does that say ATI or NVIDIA? > > Well, true, but he initially said "any azalia(4) adapter". > > I thought checking for regressions was important, too. > Meh ... "he", as in "you"