Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Bryan Linton
On 2009-05-06 15:21:44, Theo de Raadt wrote: > The newest snapshots that are headed out have a new install script based > on heavy modifications by a bunch of developers over the last 3 weeks. > > We would like to start getting feedback from people about these changes. > This is a really small n

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Miod Vallat
> > > Well, yes, I guess that is a fair assumption. I have read them, > > > just not very recently. > > > > > > Said document also says you can probably get away with installing > > > just xbase45.tgz if you don't intend on running X. > > > > It does? Could you tell me where - this needs to be f

Le site Web de votre bien immobilier pour tech

2009-05-28 Thread ymmoo.biz
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Bonjour, Vendre ou louer un bien immobilier nest pas facile et peut couter rapidement tres cher en petites annonces qui ne restent visibles quune ou deux semaines avant de devoir payer a nouveau. Mais comment se distinguer de la masse dannonces en 4 ou 5 lign

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
> On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:21:44 -0600 (MDT) > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > The newest snapshots that are headed out have a new install script based > > on heavy modifications by a bunch of developers over the last 3 weeks. On another note, I noticed that when I specify an NTP server during the installa

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Thu, 28 May 2009 16:22:32 -0600 (MDT) Theo de Raadt wrote: > >On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:29:27 -0600 (MDT) > >Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> The time for X by default, for most people, arrived more than > >> a decade ago. > > > >Great, so stop asking about it in the installer then. afterboot(8) > >can

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Theo de Raadt
>On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:29:27 -0600 (MDT) >Theo de Raadt wrote: >> > >> > I think that's a bit non-obvious (unless they're actually needed). >> >> They are needed. >> >[...] >> >> You do have a choice later. So please stop acting as if you don't >> have a choice -- you most positively do. > >I

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:29:27 -0600 (MDT) Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > I think that's a bit non-obvious (unless they're actually needed). > > They are needed. > [...] > > You do have a choice later. So please stop acting as if you don't > have a choice -- you most positively do. I know I do. >

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Thu, 28 May 2009 21:38:56 + Miod Vallat wrote: > > Well, yes, I guess that is a fair assumption. I have read them, > > just not very recently. > > > > Said document also says you can probably get away with installing > > just xbase45.tgz if you don't intend on running X. > > It does? Co

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Miod Vallat
> Well, yes, I guess that is a fair assumption. I have read them, > just not very recently. > > Said document also says you can probably get away with installing > just xbase45.tgz if you don't intend on running X. It does? Could you tell me where - this needs to be fixed but I can't see where I

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Theo de Raadt
>On Thu, 28 May 2009 14:59:14 -0600 (MDT) >Theo de Raadt wrote: >> >On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:21:44 -0600 (MDT) >> >Theo de Raadt wrote: >> >> The newest snapshots that are headed out have a new install script based >> >> on heavy modifications by a bunch of developers over the last 3 weeks. >> > >>

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Thu, 28 May 2009 14:59:14 -0600 (MDT) Theo de Raadt wrote: > >On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:21:44 -0600 (MDT) > >Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> The newest snapshots that are headed out have a new install script based > >> on heavy modifications by a bunch of developers over the last 3 weeks. > > > >May 20t

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Thu, 28 May 2009 14:04:18 -0600 Bob Beck wrote: > * Thomas Pfaff [2009-05-28 13:10]: > > May 20th snapshot. "Do you expect to run the X Window System?" > > If you choose 'no' here then the x*.tgz sets are still selected > > when you get to the installation part. Why? > > because you p

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Theo de Raadt
>On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:21:44 -0600 (MDT) >Theo de Raadt wrote: >> The newest snapshots that are headed out have a new install script based >> on heavy modifications by a bunch of developers over the last 3 weeks. > >May 20th snapshot. "Do you expect to run the X Window System?" >If you choose 'no

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Bob Beck
* Thomas Pfaff [2009-05-28 13:10]: > On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:21:44 -0600 (MDT) > Theo de Raadt wrote: > > The newest snapshots that are headed out have a new install script based > > on heavy modifications by a bunch of developers over the last 3 weeks. > > May 20th snapshot. "Do you expect to ru

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread patrick keshishian
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:21:44 -0600 (MDT) > Theo de Raadt wrote: >> The newest snapshots that are headed out have a new install script based >> on heavy modifications by a bunch of developers over the last 3 weeks. > > May 20th snapshot. B "Do

Re: New snapshots -> new installer

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:21:44 -0600 (MDT) Theo de Raadt wrote: > The newest snapshots that are headed out have a new install script based > on heavy modifications by a bunch of developers over the last 3 weeks. May 20th snapshot. "Do you expect to run the X Window System?" If you choose 'no' here