NFS server cleanup diff, 1 of 3

2009-05-20 Thread Bret S. Lambert
This is the first of three diffs intended to make me want to gouge out my eyes when reading NFS code. Legibility is good, because if nobody can read it, nobody will fix it. Please make sure that these don't asplode your setups. Thanks. - Bert Index: nfs/nfs_serv.c ==

NFS server cleanup diffs, 3 of 3

2009-05-20 Thread Bret S. Lambert
Index: nfs/nfs_syscalls.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/nfs/nfs_syscalls.c,v retrieving revision 1.67 diff -u -p -r1.67 nfs_syscalls.c --- nfs/nfs_syscalls.c 26 Jun 2008 23:56:26 - 1.67 +++ nfs/nfs_syscalls.c 27 Jun 2008 18:24:

NFS server cleanup diffs, 2 of 3

2009-05-20 Thread Bret S. Lambert
Index: nfs/nfs_serv.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/nfs/nfs_serv.c,v retrieving revision 1.56 diff -u -p -r1.56 nfs_serv.c --- nfs/nfs_serv.c 14 Jun 2008 22:44:07 - 1.56 +++ nfs/nfs_serv.c 15 Jun 2008 04:36:23 - @@

nfs retransmission book keeping

2009-05-20 Thread Thordur I. Bjornsson
Hi gang... It would be great if people running NFS (soft, and hard mounts) could give this diff a spin. what it does essentially is to redo the retransmission booking by keeping count of maximum rexmits in one place (the nfsmount structure) and kill deadthresh, (an nqnfs left over); that causes a

Re: Support for newer Broadcom bge(4) chipsets.

2009-05-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/05/21 00:09, Toni Andjelkovic wrote: > On 2009/05/17 08:14, Brad wrote: > > The following diff adds support for newer Broadcom bge(4) > > chipsets based on the BCM5761/BCM5784/BCM5785 and BCM57780 > > ASIC cores. Tested with a handful of older chipsets and > > with the BCM5764/BCM5784 chips

Re: Support for newer Broadcom bge(4) chipsets.

2009-05-20 Thread Toni Andjelkovic
On 2009/05/17 08:14, Brad wrote: > The following diff adds support for newer Broadcom bge(4) > chipsets based on the BCM5761/BCM5784/BCM5785 and BCM57780 > ASIC cores. Tested with a handful of older chipsets and > with the BCM5764/BCM5784 chipsets by some users. Same here, been testing the diff wi

Şimdi Quelle'de Harika Fırsatlar!

2009-05-20 Thread Quelle
Bu e-mail'in grafik versiyonunu gvrmek istiyorsan}z (HTML) link'i t}klay}n ya da browser'}n}za kopyalay}n: http://link.quelle.com.tr/u/gm.php?prm=DmxdpboOnM_117380508_23757_55982 Quelle'de ]ndirim Zaman}! http://link.quelle.com.tr/u/nrd.php?p=DmxdpboOnM_55982_23757_1_224 Merhaba, Avrupa'da 17 |lk

Re: Test fix for aml_xconvert die

2009-05-20 Thread David Vasek
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Marco Peereboom wrote: We only have 2 results. Please test this!! Hi! As I wrote in my original bug-report, the troublesome laptop (Acer TravelMate 430) is currently out of my reach and is running the OS it had been originally sold with. Nonetheless, I will meet its own

Re: Test fix for aml_xconvert die

2009-05-20 Thread Marco Peereboom
We only have 2 results. Please test this!! On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:17:31AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > Now with diff. > > Index: acpidebug.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/acpi/acpidebug.c,v > retrieving revision 1.22 > d

Lead Generation

2009-05-20 Thread BNBuzz.com
BNBuzz.com http://www.bnbuzz.com Sharing Knowledge 1. http://www.bnbuzz.com/lead-generation.html Lead Generation - A step by step guide to better understand! Economy is going down day by day and getting new clients is the biggest challenge business owners face every morning. Lead Genera

Re: smtpctl fix

2009-05-20 Thread Gilles Chehade
commited thanks ! gilles On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:42:45AM +0200, giovanni wrote: > Index: smtpctl.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpctl.c,v > retrieving revision 1.24 > diff -u -p -u -r1.24 smtpctl.c > --- smtpctl.c 2