On Sat, 09 May 2009 13:13:39 +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>Thanks for the attention. I really appreciate the way the OpenBSD ethos
>treats a bug seriously and promptly when it doesn't have any
>deleterious effects.
EDIT
s/when it doesn't have any/EVEN when it doesn't have any/
Rod/
*** NOTE ***
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:30:48PM -0400, System Administrator wrote:
> On 7 May 2009 at 21:06, patrick keshishian wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:25 PM, patrick keshishian
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Theo de Raadt
> > wrote:
> > >> The newest snapshots that are headed
On Thu, 7 May 2009 23:26:50 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2009/05/08 00:01, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> Doh. Sure it loops because that if will work even after the INET6 dump is
>> over. This should be better.
>
>yep - ok with me.
>
>>
>> --
>> :wq Claudio
Looks good to me too! Will it be comm
I think that these sysctl should not be writable unless securelevel is <=0..
On 2009/05/08 17:59, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> Dear tech@,
>
> It is my great pleasure to announce a patch that allows interested users
> to monitor and control the speed of the fans connected to some popular
>
Dear tech@,
It is my great pleasure to announce a patch that allows interested users
to monitor and control the speed of the fans connected to some popular
Winbond Super I/O Hardware Monitors.
The patch below supports the following chips, as shown by their dmesg name:
* W83627HF (chip only p
