--- Begin Message ---
Thanks for the feedback Guy. I revised the wording based on your
suggestion, while also noting there is a four octet access address in the
LE packet before the coding indicator.
See the updated version here since the GitHack version rendered with a
suitable Content-Type is sl
erable link to the latest version:
https://gistcdn.githack.com/sultanqasim/8b6561309f5934f084a0d938ae733b7a/raw/c9172a730117c824a1b80add472052220810e538/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR.html
Any comments from anyone else?
Thanks,
Sultan
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:55 PM Sultan Khan via tcpdump-
--- Begin Message ---
Hello all,
DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR was created close to a decade ago mainly to
support Bluetooth LE sniffers. It includes parameters describing sniffer RF
capture settings in addition to the BLE link layer packet. It was created
in the days of Bluetooth 4.0, when BLE wa
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks for the feedback, your suggestions do make the specification
clearer. I edited the specification based on your suggestions, and I also
clarified the usage of integer bit fields within the Flags field.
Link to the updated version of the spec with the latest changes:
htt
--- Begin Message ---
The reason the extra auxiliary PDU type field is needed is that the
four-bit auxiliary PDU type is ambiguous and context-dependent for
auxiliary PDUs. See Volume 6, Part B, Section 2.3, Table 2.3. The four
least significant bits of the advertising PDU header will be 0b0111 for
--- Begin Message ---
Hmm. Chris Kilgour (whiterocker) originally created the spec, and the version
on tcpdump.org was just a backup copy. Now, Chris has said that he is no longer
active in the Bluetooth LE sniffing space, and he doesn’t want to be in charge
of the spec any more.
Perhaps the sp
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks Chris. I’ll make a pull request to tcpdump-htdocs later today, and I’ll
include a link to the previous version of the spec as an archive.org link to
the old one on whiterocker.com.
Cheers,
Sultan
>>> On Jul 13, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Chris Kilgour wrote:
>> On 2020-07
--- Begin Message ---
Correct, it's a superset of the old version. OK, I'll omit the link then.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:11 PM Guy Harris wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2020, at 9:02 AM, Sultan Khan wrote:
>
> > Thanks Chris. I’ll make a pull request to tcpdump-htdocs later today,
> and I’ll include a li
--- Begin Message ---
Pull request submitted:
https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump-htdocs/pull/17
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:49 PM Sultan Khan via tcpdump-workers <
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: S
--- Begin Message ---
I think so, based on what Chris said previously about those BT related spec
pages hosted on his site. The link type list page should probably be updated to
point to the tcpdump.org version of the LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_BREDR_BB spec.
Sultan
>> On Jul 13, 2020, at 3:20 PM, Guy
10 matches
Mail list logo
