linux+v2.6.26.5/net/core/filter.c#L409)
the comparison succeeds because the large unsigned k-value for this
instruction (0xfff0) is much larger than the number of remaining bpf
instructions (flen-pc-1).
is this a bug in libpcap's protochain filter generation code?
--
Robert Edmonds
[EM
On 2008-09-18, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>
>> the comparison succeeds because the large unsigned k-value for this
>> instruction (0xfff0) is much larger than the number of remaining
>&g
SONAME since.
libpcap0.8 (0.9.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release: this is a new major version of libpcap but it is
API and ABI compatible with libpcap0.8 so the old soname and package
names were kept to avoid uncessary transition of all packages.
[...]
-- Romain Fr
few
months back:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=469579&aid=3078313&group_id=53067
could someone please look at this and tell me if the patch needs more
work or if it can be merged to mainline?
thanks.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
-
This is the tcpdump-wor