[tcpdump-workers] tcpslice maintainer

2011-08-15 Thread Michal Sekletar
Hello everyone, I'd like to send a patch for tcpslice to it's maintainer, but email address seem to be dead. Is there anyone out there still maintaining tcpslice? I hope this is right place to ask because tcpslice is related project. Thanks -- Michal Sekletar, - This is t

Re: [tcpdump-workers] [libpcap] fix typo on manpage install (#320)

2013-09-24 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:41:45PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > But it means that anyone who checks out code from git is foobar if they can > > not get the *correct* version of autoconf installed to generate the files. > > So, if it'

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Multiple call to pcap_open_live

2013-11-18 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:38:24AM -0500, Benjamin Vanheuverzwijn wrote: > Hi, Hi Benjamin, > > libpcap version: 1.4.0 (on archlinux) I am running Fedora 19 (libpcap-1.4.0). > > Is it possible to have multiple call to "pcap_open_live()" followed by > pcap_close() ? It shouldn't be a problem

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Setting the Buffer Size Without Restarting the NIC?

2014-02-06 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:36:10AM -0800, Hei Chan wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. > > I forgot to mention my OS -- CentOS 6.5. > > Now, I look at the word "activated", and I am a bit confused. > > Does it refer to a device that is enabled in the OS?  Or does it refer to a > device that

Re: [tcpdump-workers] libpcap 1.5.3 pcap_open_offline_with_tstamp_precision() broken

2014-06-06 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:21:26PM +0200, Steffen Bauch wrote: > Hi, > > libpcap 1.5.3 (as deployed in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS) (and current GIT > master head) will not output timestamps in a right way if pcapng > savefiles are used and timestamp conversion is requested with > pcap_open_offline_with_tsta

Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcapng save files

2014-07-03 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:52:03AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Guy Harris wrote: > > The current libpcap support uses the existing APIs, which can't expose > > the full capabilities of pcap-ng; it requires all interfaces in the > > pcap-ng file to have the same link-layer hea

Re: [tcpdump-workers] buildbot failure in tcpdump+libpcap on Solaris-10-SPARC

2014-08-22 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:33:14AM +, buildbot-no-re...@wireshark.org wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Solaris-10-SPARC while > building tcpdump+libpcap. > Full details are available at: > http://buildbot.wireshark.org/tcpdump/builders/Solaris-10-SPARC/builds/100 >

Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump and libpcap releases, and future thoughts

2014-09-08 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 03:34:14PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > I pushed the button on libpcap 1.6.2 early last night. > This includes patches that Guy asked for. It seems that we might > need more patches to better select Linux memory mapped packet > choices? > > I pushed the button on

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769?

2014-11-23 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:01:15PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:47:06PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > > It's supposed to happen, but I'm checking. > > Should be there now. Is cron failing to do it's thing? > > Ok, the fixes still aren't on master, but now there

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769?

2014-11-24 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 09:22:23AM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Guy Harris wrote: > > (I'm fine with making it the Official Home if Michael chooses to do so. > > I've managed to cope with the workflow changes required when > > libpcap/tcpdump switched to Git, when Wireshark sw

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769?

2014-11-25 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:52:59AM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:26:06AM -0800, Michal Zalewski wrote: > > I didn't request one, but probably. RH or Debian folks can likely just > > assign one from their pools. > > I can ask the Debian security team to assign one, or

Re: [tcpdump-workers] bpf.tcpdump.org vs github

2014-11-25 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:01:11PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > > okay, can we start again. > I would appreciate some clear data and clear complaints. > > This is what I heard: > a) which is "master", bpf or github? There are commits on github/master which are not on bpf. We already

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Official patches for CVE-2014-8767/CVE-2014-8768/CVE-2014-8769?

2014-11-25 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 03:43:21PM +0100, Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:52:59AM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:26:06AM -0800, Michal Zalewski wrote: > > > I didn't request one, but probably. RH or Debian folks can likel

Re: [tcpdump-workers] bpf.tcpdump.org vs github

2014-11-25 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:12:18PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Michal Sekletar wrote: > >> okay, can we start again. I would appreciate some clear data and > >> clear complaints. > >> > >> This is what I heard: a) which is &qu

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Libpcap timeout settings in tcpdump - too long when printing to a terminal?

2015-01-09 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 06:57:08PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: > With TPACKET_V3 support, Linux users are discovering what those of us using > BSD-flavored OSes have known for quite a while: > > > http://askubuntu.com/questions/570885/can-tcpdump-on-ubuntu-14-04-show-packets-in-real-time > >

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Work on development

2015-05-11 Thread Michal Sekletar
On 05/08/2015 06:53 PM, Jesse Johnson wrote: > I would like to put some effort into the code base. Much appreciated. > What are we using to edit the code and submit changes? Any special rules for > submitting changes? To work on tcpdump/libpcap you don't need any specialized tools. Basic tools

Re: [tcpdump-workers] how many stable branches to have

2015-05-25 Thread Michal Sekletar
On 05/21/2015 08:16 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > I have no problem with having lts- branches created for distros, and I'd > rather do that than have "old stable". I'd rather call them something like: >wheezy-4.7 > or centos7-4.7 Clearly having CentOS branch upstream would make my

Re: [tcpdump-workers] how many stable branches to have

2015-05-26 Thread Michal Sekletar
On 05/26/2015 11:46 AM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote: AFAIK, This is not the scheme used by the linux kernel. they don't have '-stable' or '-longterm' in their names as these are moving 'attributes' given on the main page of kernel.org. You are right, those really are attributes. I propose

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Multiple interface listening modification

2015-06-04 Thread Michal Sekletar
On 06/04/2015 07:28 AM, Tugrul Erdogan wrote: I am using libpcap 1.7.3 version and I need to listen multiple interface by same user process call. I am planning to patch libpcap to be able to use a socket array which will be attached different interfaces. Can't you just pcap_open more interface