Why not use the 'any' device on Linux? I'm not sure if it will be
supported in 2.6.20, but
in recent kernels it is :-)
Best regards
Michael
On Aug 16, 2006, at 8:15 PM, Richard H. wrote:
Level: pcaplib novice
OS: Linux 2.6.20
I've been running a pcaplib app that reads continually from a
Hi Guy,
could you register a DLT for SCTP? It would be similar to
LINKTYPE_IPV4 / DLT_IPV4 or LINKTYPE_IPV6 / DLT_IPV6,
just covering the SCTP packet without any lower layer.
Suggested name: LINKTYPE_SCTP / DLT_SCTP.
Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Thanks a lot for your hel
On Nov 24, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
>
>> could you register a DLT for SCTP? It would be similar to
>> LINKTYPE_IPV4 / DLT_IPV4 or LINKTYPE_IPV6 / DLT_IPV6,
>> just covering the SCTP packet wi
On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:56 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
>
>> This is what we want to dump to a file when running SCTP over DTLS over UDP,
>> after DTLS has decrypted the packet. This stack will be using for RTCWeb
>
On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Téssio Fechine wrote:
> Hello,
> I was trying to analyze the traffic generated by this command:
>
> root@atena:~# dig rt-dq.quimica.ufpb.br @150.165.145.1
>
> But I noticed that when the option '-w file' was not used, the tcpdump
> capture changed:
>
> ** WITH -w (
> On 14 Jan 2015, at 18:19, Denis Ovsienko wrote:
>
>> Eventually, we'll be using this format to debug multi-path TCP, in which
>> case
>> the IP addresses (and maybe even the IP4/IP6-ness of it) might change.
>
> Also there exists SCTP, which implements the concept of variable (0..65535)
>
> On 5. Sep 2023, at 09:34, Francois-Xavier Le Bail
> wrote:
>
> On 29/08/2023 16:34, Scheffenegger, Richard via tcpdump-workers wrote:
>> And some initial discussions which aren't yet reflected on the mailing list:
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Scheffenegger, Richard
>> Sent: Frei
--- Begin Message ---
> On 21. Mar 2020, at 23:10, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote:
>> Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team:
>> https://github.com/pcapng
>
>> with one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a
>> "the-tcpdump-group" te
--- Begin Message ---
> On 25. Jan 2023, at 21:33, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
> On 25. Jan 2023, at 17:42, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure that pcap*NG* is so incredibly established that we can't change
>> it. I just hate "Next Generation" for anything, particularly when time
>> m
