Re: [tcpdump-workers] Request for DLT for new BlueZ Monitor

2014-01-14 Thread Chris Kilgour
nor even cover HCI. For example open-source sniffers like ubertooth and gr-bluetooth capture at the RF level. It's likely that a DLT allocation request will be forthcoming for capturing bluetooth over-the-air [1]. [1] https://github.com/greatscottgadgets/ubertooth/wiki/Bluetooth-Captur

[tcpdump-workers] Two DLT Requests For Bluetooth RF Captures

2014-02-14 Thread Chris Kilgour
w DLTs and pseudoheaders? Or do the pcap devs update pcap/bpf.h independently? Any other advice to help get this request approved and the results into libpcap would be appreciated. [1] http://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes.html [2] https://github.com/greatscottgadgets/ubertooth/wiki/Bluetooth-Captures-in-P

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Two DLT Requests For Bluetooth RF Captures

2014-02-14 Thread Chris Kilgour
On 02/14/2014 04:46 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > > What is the "nanosecond offset to pcap timestamp"? pcap-ng lets you specify > the resolution of time stamps, and even pcap lets you, at least with newer > versions of libpcap and Wireshark, specify nanosecond resolution with a > different magic num

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Two DLT Requests For Bluetooth RF Captures

2014-02-16 Thread Chris Kilgour
On 02/14/2014 04:50 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > >> Translating them into the style in the pages under >> http://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes would be helpful. It avoids worrying about >> C/C-derived-language data structure names - or anything *else*

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Two DLT Requests For Bluetooth RF Captures

2014-02-16 Thread Chris Kilgour
ull requests on the GitHub repository for the Web site. > Sure, I will keep hosting these pages. Chris Kilgour ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Two DLT Requests For Bluetooth RF Captures

2014-02-18 Thread Chris Kilgour
endian definition, given your earlier statement. Since BT itself is little-endian oriented, and the majority of BT-sniffer users are likely Intel-based, little-endian seems the way to go. And by the way, thanks for the quick turnaround on the DLT allocations. Chris Kilgour ___