Re: [tcpdump-workers] Link type proposal, IEEE 802.1Qbu Frame Preemption Protocol

2017-12-01 Thread Anton Glukhov
Correct. I think that CRC(or mCRC for preemption) is also important and I would like to add it too. So finally we have: Preamble with SFD | Mac header | Payload | CRC/mCRC 2017-12-01 5:56 GMT+01:00 Guy Harris : > On Nov 30, 2017, at 2:27 AM, Anton Glukhov > wrote: > > > 1. You

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Link type proposal, IEEE 802.1Qbu Frame Preemption Protocol

2017-12-02 Thread Anton Glukhov
02.1br it would be the “context” in which “ordinary” traffic is called “express” packets. > On 1 Dec 2017, at 23:08, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2017, at 12:56 AM, Anton Glukhov wrote: > >> Correct. I think that CRC(or mCRC for preemption) is also important and I >

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Link type proposal, IEEE 802.1Qbu Frame Preemption Protocol

2017-12-03 Thread Anton Glukhov
Yes, absolutely. Thank you! > On 2 Dec 2017, at 18:56, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 4:06 AM, Anton Glukhov wrote: > >> You are right, “express" packet is exactly the same as “ordinary”. From my >> point of view it’s ok to show express traffic