[tcpdump-workers] Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative

2024-09-10 Thread Vadim Goncharov
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:38:50 + "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote: > > Vadim Goncharov writes: > > > I've put a sketch of design to https://github.com/nuclight/bpf64 > > with files: > > Counter proposal: > > 1. Define the Lua execution environment in the kernel. > > 2. Add syscall to su

[tcpdump-workers] Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative

2024-09-10 Thread Vadim Goncharov
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:41:20 + "Gavin D. Howard" wrote: > Hello, > > New user here, not a contributor. > > > Ensuring kernel stability? Just don't allow arbitrary pointers, > > like original BPF. Guaranteed termination time? It's possible if > > you place some restrictions. For example, don

[tcpdump-workers] Re: BPF64: proposal of platform-independent hardware-friendly backwards-compatible eBPF alternative

2024-09-10 Thread Vadim Goncharov
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:58:25 +0100 David Chisnall wrote: > On 10 Sep 2024, at 14:44, Vadim Goncharov > wrote: > > > > I am not an experience assembler user and don't understand how > > Spectre works - that's why I've written RFC letter even before spec > > finished - but isn't that (Spectre) an