On 05/08/2018 14:46, Denis Ovsienko wrote:
> That said, if the output uses UTC, it could be helpful to use an unambiguous
> format as well, as in commit 99412d6.
In this commit, there is:
strftime(time_buf, sizeof (time_buf), "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S", tm);
According to the RFC3339:
Z
On Aug 12, 2018, at 7:06 AM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail
wrote:
> Should we add the "Z" suffix (for UTC) ?
> strftime(time_buf, sizeof (time_buf), "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ", tm);
Should we do so in ts_date_hmsfrac_print() as well, if time_flag isn't
LOCAL_TIME?
_
On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 20:35:36 +0100 Guy Harris wrote
> On Aug 12, 2018, at 7:06 AM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail
> wrote:
>
> > Should we add the "Z" suffix (for UTC) ?
> > strftime(time_buf, sizeof (time_buf), "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ", tm);
That's a good point, I used to think the
